Branki, C N E (1995) Agents, applications, and interactions in collaborative building design. PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde, UK.
Abstract
Over the past decade a new generation of design tools has emerged which has, for instance, the potential to simulate any building as an integrated environmental and energy system. While powerful at their core, these computer models suffer from several user interface limitations. The starting point of this thesis is to attempt to solve these problems by developing an Intelligent Front End (IFE) for building performance appraisal in general and an Energy Simulation Program (ESP) in particular. The limitations are highlighted, a solution in the shape of an IFE architecture is described, and a knowledge based user conceptualisation model is installed and explained. The complexity of design means that most buildings are designed by teams rather by individuals. Each specialist team member typically makes use of a software tool appropriate to their particular needs. This approach raises considerable problems in the sharing of information between the team members from different organisations working together over a network, supported by design software tools. The second part of this thesis attempts to support this approach by extending the principles of the IFE to support collaborative design. The critical issues in managing and sharing information across design organisations are: the forming of data structure and query mechanisms for accessing information in a user friendly and transparent fashion; developing an environment that promotes information sharing that is unobtrusive to the designer. The goal here is to develop the infrastructure accompanied by software tools inter-operability that bypasses individual disciplines.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; building design; building performance; collaborative design; designer; simulation |
| Index terms: | complexity, information sharing, building performance, critical issue, user interface, building design, program, collaborative design, data structure, agent, energy system, designer, appraisal, interaction, energy simulation |
| Subjects: | factor and component analysis, energy systems, data science, profession, data exchange, practitioner, software systems, human-computer interaction, behavioral psychology, quality assurance, systems engineering, modelling and simulation, risk assessment, architectural design, design methods |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Quality Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here