Figueiredo, W C (1995) A KBES to analyze the environmental impact of proposed highway design alternatives. PhD thesis, University of Central Florida, USA.
Abstract
This study addresses the application of a knowledge based expert system as a tool for selecting the best alternative for a proposed highway alignment from multiple alternatives based on environmental features. The automated environmental evaluation aid method uses Expert Systems to complete the approach of automation, performing the integration functions. Noise Prediction and Air Quality analyses for the attributes noise and air are performed in detail, and other environmental attributes are generalized. The VP-Expert shell, version 3.10, was the tool used to build the expert system prototype. The prototype was tested with real design cases and it was verified that the system is able to develop an acceptable selection among several alignment alternatives for a new expressway section. The main feature of the evaluation is the utilization of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the following environmental attributes: noise pollution, air pollution, water (surface water and wetlands) affected, endangered species habitat disruption, wildlife habitat disruption, and displacement of houses by the future ROW (right of way) of the new facility. AHP, a multicriterion's decision making process created by Thomas Saaty in 1972, is used as a decision making methodology to select the best alternative.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | highway; noise; air quality; automation; decision making; environmental impact; integration; pollution; analytic hierarchy process; expert system |
| Index terms: | decision-making process, pollution, automation, air quality, prototype, surface water, noise pollution, air pollution, integration, decision-making, methodology, environmental impact, expert system |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, climate science, modelling and simulation, automation and robotics, research methods, environmental health, environmental engineering, organizational analysis, data management, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here