Filho, A J (1995) Technological change and informal housebuilding in Brazil. PhD thesis, University College London, UK.
Abstract
This work analyses the role and effects of building material industries over the development of housebuilding activities, with special reference to the informal sector in Brazil. The central argument is that the processes of informal housebuilding have progressed following the general trend of housebuilding industrialization. Informal housebuilding has remained irregular as far as official regulations are concerned, nevertheless increasing its linkages with formal activities. This link has become a substantial share in the demand of certain building materials and components, which are produced by formal industries. The ways by which progress in housebuilding is undertaken are analysed, namely, managerial innovations, labour training, mechanization and substitution of materials and components. The work shows why these substitutions became the effective alternative for technical and technological changes for the informal housebuilding activity, outlining its major importance as a means of housing provision for the poor. It also explores the links between the informal and formal agents that are performing such changes, identifying their causes and dynamics, positive and negative effects, and prospects for development. Moreover, the work findings support the argument that an effective industrialization of housebuilding is on course. This is depicted as an open industrialization taking place in the construction industrial network, engendering several building processes and involving both formal and informal housebuilding activities. The originality of this work appears: firstly, when reexamining the debate about low-income housebuilding. It identifies and tests the key arguments for technological change within housing policies. Secondly, it details the changes in the processes used in the informal sector for the production of low-income housing and defines the interplay of these processes. Thirdly, it defines the evolution of the relationship of formal activities and informal housebuilding.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building process; housebuilding; industrialization; informal sector; innovation; labour; low-income housing; regulation; training; gender; technological change; Brazil |
| Index terms: | industrialization, Brazil, agent, building process, housing provision, informal sector, evolution, regulation, linkage, low-income housing, housebuilding, income, dynamics, building material, housing policy, technological change |
| Subjects: | Geography, construction integration, economic development, systems engineering, political science, industry analysis, building construction, housing and residential development, innovation studies, practitioner, business, economic analysis, environmental science, building materials, public policy |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Governance, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here