Holt, G D (1995) A methodology for predicting the performance of construction contractors. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, UK.
Abstract
This thesis addresses a fundamental decision problem, encountered by UK construction clients faced with a construction contract to assign: the judicious selection of a contractor. Initially, the inadequacies of current selection practices are confirmed. These findings influence the development of a new selection model, with emphasis on promoting a rationalised, quantitative technique able to identify the potential (project) performance of those contractors evaluated. This approach contrasts with present trends which promote subjectivity and rely heavily upon practitioner experience /judgment. A nationwide survey of practitioners and client groups identifies discriminating criteria essential to contractor selection, whilst also facilitating the knowledge of their importance (via weighting indices) within the selection process. The multiattribute analysis (MAA) technique embraces these criteria and is employed for its ability to aid decision making in the presence of multiple, often conflicting objectives, as characterised by this 'real-life' decision problem. Within the model, contractor’s attributes are measured, the resulting scores serving as multiplicands for the aforementioned weighting indices. The aggregate resultant yields a comparison measure. Utility values are also exercised to mirror client preferences and thereby influence optimal choice. The new technique is fully elucidated by worked example with validity being achieved by application to live selection situations. Finally, the potential for any change to existing tendering practice is investigated, via nationwide survey of UK construction contractors. The author has to some extent encompassed building and civil engineering, but the emphasis of this work is on the building sector.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor; performance; questionnaire survey; selection criteria |
| Index terms: | validity, construction client, aggregate, judgment, contractor selection, selection criteria, presence, construction contract, survey, subjectivity, preference, construction contractor, practitioner, questionnaire, decision-making, methodology |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, tendering, environmental science, materials science, dispute resolution, practitioner, human factors and perception, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, contract type |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here