Kim, J S (1995) Reliability-based design of a retaining wall. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
Abstract
A retaining wall is subject to various limit states such as sliding, overturning and bearing capacity, and it can fail by any one of them. Since a great deal of uncertainty is involved in the analysis of the limit states, the use of deterministic conventional safety factors may produce a misleading result. The main objective of this study is to develop a procedure for the optimum design of a retaining wall by using the reliability theory. Typical gravity retaining walls with four different heights were selected in this study. The walls were designed first to satisfy the conventional design criteria, and later the safety indices inherent in the walls were computed by using Advanced First Order Second Moment method. With the safety indices the probabilities of failure for the three limit states were calculated and the probabilistically optimized design could be achieved by using the probability of failure. The influence of the coefficient of variation on the probability of failure was investigated. The ratios of base width to wall height which lead to the optimum design were obtained through a parametric study.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Barker, R M |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | failure; reliability; uncertainty; safety; probability; retaining wall |
| Index terms: | variation, safety factor, retaining wall |
| Subjects: | financial risk, contractual condition, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here