Memarzia, K (1995) Productivity and the Iranian building industry: a case study of component manufacture. PhD thesis, University of York, UK.
Abstract
This study is concerned with the issue of building industrialisation in Iran. It focuses on the formulation of concepts and policies that are based on the local construction industry. The aim is not to identify which system or technology it is more appropriate to adopt, or to propose ready-made solutions, but rather to identify a set of 'practical' recommendations. The problem we are addressing is that: Despite repeated failure, industrialised production of building has been seen as the only solution to solve the increasing deficit in residential building since 1951. Decisions often continue to be based on the assumption that the traditional building process is inadequate and must be replaced with 'mass housing', using advanced technology and industrialised methods. The core of this research is based on field surveys, literature studies, and participant observation and experience and, is presented to support the following hypotheses. Hypothesis 1 is concerned with the nature and organisation of the local construction industry: There is a two-tier building industry in Iran: the traditional/conventional (T/C), and the modern sector construction industry (CI), with a rather weak relationship between them. A lack of recognition for this unique structure may result in the total demise of the traditional sector. This study argues that 'industrialisation' is only one method of improving productivity, and that productivity can be improved in the context of the local building industry, regardless of technological change. The study argues for the mass production of, building components, rather than 'mass housing production'. Hypothesis 2 is concerned with the improvement of productivity and appropriate building industrialisation, based on local potentials: One of the appropriate ways to increase productivity in the building industry in Iran is by rationalising the design and process of building with the gradual introduction of lightweight, loose-fit, low technology building components in a process of 'componentisation'. This dissertation sets out to understand the nature of the construction industry in Iran and its socio-economic environment. It attempts to discuss the specific problems affecting its sustainable development and to identify the different ways open to the industry to increase its productivity. The potential role of 'componentisation' is examined by primary interviews, a field survey and follow-up interviews. The 'two tiers' of the industry are examined by separate studies of the structure and organisation of the T/ C and CI sectors. The major arguments raised in the course of the study and the two hypotheses are examined in a final recapitulation, leading to conclusions and recommendations.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building industry; building process; components; improvement; industrialisation; productivity; residential; sustainable development; technological change; interview; participant observation; Iran |
| Index terms: | building process, building component, housing, sustainable development, industrialization, survey, observation, low-technology, interview, construction industry, dissertation, building industry, traditional building, technological change, productivity, residential building, case study |
| Subjects: | building construction, industry analysis, architectural elements, economic development, management, health safety and environment, innovation and technology management, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, construction type, innovation studies |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here