Miller, J B (1995) Aligning infrastructure development strategy to meet current public needs. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
Abstract
Since 1933, American public construction has supposedly been "locked" into the sequential design, then build procurement model for infrastructure development. This approach, which is entirely dependent on declining cash appropriations by government, has become increasingly ineffective in meeting public infrastructure needs. Procurement methods used in modern Hong Kong and in the United States between 1780 and 1933 are analyzed systematically using two axes to describe Government's two fundamental strategies in the development of infrastructure. The first strategy is either to "push" projects "directly" through federally funded contracts, or to "pull" projects in the private sector through "indirect" means such as incentives, subsidies, and mandates. The second strategy is either to "segment" each step in the procurement process--planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance--from one another or to combine all these steps into a single "system" procurement. Arrayed on two axes, these strategies fall in one of four quadrants. In the broad historical context of American infrastructure development, the current sequential design-then-build process in Quadrant IV is the aberrant procurement method, not the Build-Operate-Transfer and Design-Build-Operate methods which are described by Quadrants II and I, respectively. Advantages of infrastructure development in Quadrants I and II include independent, multiple verifications of project feasibility, and the opportunity for governments to select best value from different combinations of quality, price, and time of delivery. Other significant advantages include the use and application of state of the art technology to complex infrastructure projects, substantial savings in time, typical savings in capital costs, reduced need for large temporary additions to public engineering staffs, private financing of capital costs, significant leveraging of public financial contributions to projects, predictable future public expenditures for maintenance and operation, improved public fiscal management of infrastructure development, reduced concern over conflicts of interest, and improved management of project risk. The United States should join the rest of the world in moving to capture the advantages of Quadrants I and II by adopting a mixture of procurement strategies which include, rather than exclude these methods. Recommendations are made for doing so.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Moavenzadeh, F |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best value; private sector; conflicts; financing; operation and maintenance; public infrastructure; Hong Kong; United States; procurement method; government; infrastructure project |
| Index terms: | infrastructure development, strategy, operation and maintenance, capital cost, procurement process, mandate, United States, financing, state of the art, procurement strategy, savings, private sector, public infrastructure, project feasibility, conflicts of interest, public expenditure, subsidy, procurement method, Hong Kong, infrastructure project, build-operate-transfer, best value, public construction |
| Subjects: | management, accounting and finance, maintenance engineering, Geography, infrastructure engineering, building construction, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, professional ethics, political science, research dissemination and communication, value management, contractual arrangements, bidding, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Governance, Procurement, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here