Napolitan, C L (1995) Improvement to the forecast precision of the factor model for masonry productivity. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Abstract
Several techniques exist for forecasting productivity of labor-intensive construction activities. The Factor Model is one approach. This method theorizes that productivity is influenced by factors in the work and in the environment. The factors in the work can be identified and quantified. A regression model is created from an analysis of these factors and the model equation is used to predict productivity. The Factor Model for masonry has been demonstrated as a reliable and accurate forecasting method on average; however, precision can be off for any single project. Improvement to the forecast precision of the Factor Model is the focus of the research. More than 900 days of daily productivity observations from 25 projects were analyzed. Analysis of variance, correlation and multivariate regression were used in the study. The study defines a new factor and establishes a revised model structure for predicting masonry productivity. A complexity variable is quantified for exterior and foundation work and incorporated into the revised model structure. The new model is called the Complexity Model. Forecasts of productivity using the Complexity Model and the Factor Model are compared for eight projects at the 5% to 25% completion stage. At 5% project completion, the Complexity Model forecasts are 6% more precise than the Factor Model forecasts. Accuracy decreases by approximately the same percentage. For one group, consisting of four projects with small first-day variation, the Complexity Model showed a 40% improvement in both forecast accuracy and precision. The findings provide an understanding in explaining, predicting and forecasting labor-intensive resources for construction operations. Further research is indicated.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Thomas, H R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; complexity; masonry; forecasting; productivity; mason |
| Index terms: | construction operation, mason, productivity, construction activity, forecasting, regression model, variance, complexity, variation, accuracy |
| Subjects: | professional development, contractual condition, management, statistical analysis, systems engineering, measurement and scaling, practitioner, prediction and forecasting, construction operations |
| Topics: | Site Management, Contract Administration, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here