Newton, A J (1995) The planning and management of detailed building design. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.
Abstract
Historically, building design has been manageable without the help of special planning and management techniques, whereas in construction there have been clearer, more easily realisable benefits. As buildings become technically more complex and design teams more specialised and fragmented, the need to plan and co-ordinate the design process with greater accuracy is becoming increasingly important. Traditionally building design work has been planned in a perfunctory manner, often in the belief that this creative and iterative process cannot be analysed and planned in detail. This situation has been perpetuated by a lack of understanding of design information flow and dependency and the availability of suitable planning techniques. ADePT (Analytical Design Planning Technique) has been developed in this research and permits a more sophisticated approach to the planning of building design work to be taken. This prototype methodology uses Design Structure Matrix Analysis (DSMA) to examine a Design Process Model (DPM) of the building design process. The synthesis of these two techniques produces a powerful but easily understood tool to assist in the planning and management of complex, multi-disciplinary building design problems. Traditional design programming is time consuming and reliant on a planner's experien'e, with each task and link often being defined afresh at the beginning of each new project. The Design Process Model, constructed from data flow diagrams, eliminates much of this subjectivity by generically representing the tasks involved, and the information flowing in the design of any building in a consistent, re-usable manner. The unsuitability of traditional planning tools also contributes to the development of unrealistic design programmes; design is an inherently iterative activity and techniques such as network analysis, are unable to represent this type of relationship. ADePT overcomes these failings by using DSMA to analyse the DPM to reveal how to most efficiently order inter-dependent tasks based purely on the optimal flow of design information. ADePT can also incorporate the impact of external influences such as construction programme, materials procurement or resourcing demands to be superimposed on this idealised design programme, allowing their influence on the optimal design task order to be assessed.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; multi-disciplinary; subjectivity; building design; programming; matrix analysis; network analysis |
| Index terms: | network analysis, building design, becoming, matrix analysis, planner, design process, prototype, subjectivity, design team, design structure matrix, accuracy, information flow, programme, planning technique, methodology, programming |
| Subjects: | professional development, research methods, information systems, philosophical process, project controls, human factors and perception, design methods, programming, profession, architectural design, data science, professional practice, data analysis and analytics, modelling and simulation, urban planning |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Time Control, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here