Integrating design and construction to improve constructability through an effective usage of IT

Underwood, J (1995) Integrating design and construction to improve constructability through an effective usage of IT. PhD thesis, University of Salford, UK.

Abstract

It is now widely recognised that bridging the gap between design and construction is essential for improving product quality, cost, lead time, and materials waste. The design of buildings has been separated from its production since at least the mid 19th century with professions growing up reinforcing this division. The result has not only led to the decay of integration but also to a growing misunderstanding of the role of each profession. This study proposed an information approach to improve the constructability of the design along with an object oriented analysis technique to model the design information. The model has been mapped into an object oriented development environment, leading to the development of a design tool for designers to use. The developed system aims to improve the constructability of the design without effecting the flexibility and creativity of the current design methods. Such an approach has enabled a closer link between design and construction through a better usage of IT, and the automation of 'Design to Construct' principles which do not diminish designers' creativity. Common design-related site problems have been established. Information related to these main problems have in turn been examined and traced all the way back to a top level process, i.e. the design stage. Information was analysed, using various techniques, with the aim of: a) identifying the degree of integration among the various design parties involved b) tracing back construction related problems to their relevant design processes, c) examining the impact of early design decisions on construction, and d) re-engineering the design function to incorporate a solution which acknowledges the identified site problems within the design function. This study attempted to break down the project's vast information into groups of related information which could easily be modelled, thus significantly narrowing down the amount of information involved and increasing the likelihood of producing a better information model leading to practical results. Such grouping was based on construction problem areas, as highlighted by previous research in this field, i.e. superstructure, substructure, finishing, etc. where each problem area could then be traced back to its design stage. Solutions produced for these groups could be incorporated into the design practice which could improve the constructability of the final product. Following this approach through a case study for one particular problem area, i.e. the superstructure of concrete frame office, a detail analysis was carried out. The main construction problems on site were identified, related sources of information were determined, and the relevant level of design, within which such problems could be eliminated or minimised were highlighted. A focused and well defined process analysis was then carried out to determine the relevant design processes along with their involved information and information flows. Shifting away from traditional structured methods of analysis, an object oriented technique was adopted to produce a data model for those design processes that have the greatest influence on construction problems. This technique proved to be very effective in producing a well structured data model with the consequence of being easily mapped into an object oriented development environment. An integrated object oriented system has been developed with the potential to improve the construction related problems. The system attempts to integrate essential information at an early stage in the design process such as; grid layout dimension, minimum floor to ceiling height, cladding type, maximum percentage clear glazed factor, beam and column construction types, and use it to produce information to generate the final building plan such as; beam, column and slab depths, window length and depth, revised grid layout dimension, revised floor to ceiling height, cladding arrangement. Both subjective and objective design information is translated into the final design outline. This system therefore, brings together the necessary information originating from various members within the design process and ensures this information is made available as and when required.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: flexibility; process analysis; automation; constructability; creativity; design decision; design practice; integration; designer; case study
Index terms: process analysis, constructability, window, creativity, data model, design and construction, lead time, product quality, cladding, design process, case study, design method, column, design of building, design stage, design practice, profession, beam, dimension, information flow, integration, design decision, designer, automation
Subjects: management, structural engineering, project controls, institututions, building materials, profession, contractual arrangements, data science, building design, data collection methods, design practice, innovation and creative processes, professional practice, quality assurance, construction integration, design process, architectural elements, automation and robotics, organizational analysis, design methods, information systems, health monitoring assessment and metrics
Topics: Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Time Control, Digital Applications, Procurement, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here