Yisa, S B (1995) A methodology for evaluating the marketing function in the UK construction industry. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, UK.
Abstract
The UK construction industry holds a major place in the British economy contributing an average of 6.2% of the total GDP for the UK and employs on average about 5.6% of the nation's employees in employment.. The industry is a complex interaction of a number of different types of organisations. At the hub of the industry are the professional (Designers) firms responsible for the technical and the engineering aspects of construction; and the Main Contractors, - the organisations that co-ordinate and execute construction projects. Like many non consumer based industries, the construction industry has been slow to adopt the marketing concept. Marketing concept suggests a totally new way of looking at a business and would mean a departure from the traditional approach management of these firms. This study was set out as an exploratory study to investigate management and practice of the marketing function in construction industry, with a view to identify a wide range of marketing activities currently being carried out by the firms and criteria for setting marketing objectives. The study identified a wide variety of marketing practices currently being employed in the industry, and a wide range of marketing objectives as set by firms. The survey also form that marketing is still poorly managed in the industry. The study identified a wide range of factors affecting effective marketing practice in the industry. Further to this a case study was conducted to provide some psychological explanation to many of the issues arising from the main survey. Up till now, no comprehensive quantitative model for evaluation of marketing function is available to assist the construction firms in assessing their marketing practices. This report presents a quantitative model based on elements of efficiency and effectiveness of marketing practices within the UK construction firms. Although it is still at a preliminary stage it hold a great potential as an effective instrument for evaluating marketing practices in construction. Three different approaches were adopted for testing of this model. First, to test the characteristic average grading function for the industry as given by the model in Chapter 8. Second, to demonstrate how to apply this model to a group of individual firms and the interpretation of results. Third, sensitivity analysis to to study the responses of grading function to changes in the variables of the model construct. The three steps show that this model can , with a high degree of accuracy show the marketing position of a firm and also detect any managerial and resource deficiencies concerning marketing practices within the firm. The tests re-echoed a general lack of commitment on the part of senior managements in the industry to marketing function.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; marketing; markets; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | commitment, survey, accuracy, exploratory study, construction firm, sensitivity analysis, methodology, construction project, questionnaire, employment, designer, efficiency, main contractor, case study, interaction, construction industry, testing, markets, effectiveness, marketing |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, behavioral psychology, environmental hazards, production management, professional development, management, research methods, performance management, professional practice, economic analysis, psychology, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, business, organization |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here