Adul-Hamid, R (1996) Construction duration prediction using neural network methodology. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.
Abstract
The work presented in the thesis is concerned with the investigation and development of a neural network model for predicting construction duration. Previous works in construction duration prediction were reviewed and the limitations of the existing prediction models were highlighted. As a result, a newly emerging Al technique namely, neural networks is proposed as an alternative modelling environment.The fundamentals of neural networks are introduced and the selection of the most appropriate neural network paradigm is justified. The basics of the neural network paradigm selected i.e. backpropagation, are conveyed using a systems perspective, and a mathematical exposition, at the depth suitable for understanding the system Implementation and simulation, is given. Discussions to address issues of convergence focus on several aspects, including practical properties, of the algorithm. A synthesized methodology for developing neural network models is presented, using principled heuristic approaches.Guided by this methodology, a construction duration prediction model was developed and tested. The effects of network configuration and learning parameters, namely initial weight, learning rate coefficient and momentum, on network performance were investigated. The optimal network configuration for this construction duration problem was found to be 22:19:1 with initial weight = 0.1, = 1.0 and a = 0.9, giving predictive accuracy, stated in term of R2, of 96.6%. The work also interpreted the connection weights of the trained network, to demystify the black box image of the technique. Results of the neural network model were compared to a form of stepwise multiple regression and also with human experts predictions. The comparative study results indicated that the overall performance of the neural network exceeds that of both of this methods.From a neural network point of view, this research has established that there is a significant predictive relationship between a number of projects characteristic factors and its construction duration. It Is concluded that neural networks provide an effective alternative approach to organising available information on construction projects for use in early stage prediction of construction duration, and it is suggested that its application to cost prediction could be equally effective.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; duration; construction project; learning; heuristic; multiple regression; neural network; simulation |
| Index terms: | accuracy, implementation, paradigm, methodology, comparative study, heuristic, connection weight, duration, multiple-regression, neural network, cost prediction, prediction model, construction project, investigation, modelling, configuration |
| Subjects: | artificial intelligence, systems engineering, financial and cost management, production management, analytical methods, prediction and forecasting, research methods, professional development, statistical analysis, risk assessment, data collection methods, project controls, research design and methodology, education and knowledge transfer, structural engineering, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Project Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Information Management, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here