International construction financing strategies: Influential factors and decision-making

Al-Dughaither, K A (1996) International construction financing strategies: Influential factors and decision-making. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.

Abstract

Many international engineering and construction firms, as well as local construction companies, are unfamiliar with, or reluctant to deal with innovative financing techniques such as countertrade and project finance. These two techniques have become popular and desirable, compared with traditional financing, with foreign projects' owners worldwide. In this research, a Data Interpretation and Analysis Model, DIAM (statistical model), and a Multicriteria Decision Making Model, MDM (based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP), were developed. Based on DIAM, data were collected from the top international contractors worldwide to assess the extent and spatial distribution of these new financing techniques, and the obstacles that may contribute to contractors' decisions not to attempt to use these techniques. However, the main goal of this research is to develop the MDM and apply it to explore the points of view of two groups: professionals financing experts and experienced chief financing officers at the international construction companies, with respect to financing international construction. The research extracted their knowledge and judgments in this regard. The group-decision making model (GDM), was developed to solve the issue of long questionnaires and to provide consistent judgments. The questionnaires demonstrate the state of art in obtaining best judgments of group decision-making at different locations. This information is then used to analyze and evaluate the two financing techniques, stated above, compared with the traditional financing method via MDM. Using MDM, two ranking and analysis sets were developed utilizing the Expert Choice software package. The decision making tool ranks and analyzes these new financing techniques with respect to traditional financing. The ranking and analysis were based on several criteria and sub-criteria, presented in MDM's hierarchy structure, which compose the characteristics of the project. The study revealed the importance of the political and economic stability in the project location and emphasized the role of the project's owner in the contractor's decision to engage in the new financing techniques. This role is in terms of the project's owner creditworthiness and his assistance to the contractor. Marketing and operating experience is also an influential factor in the financing strategy. The contractor's decision also was influenced by issues such as the availability of joint venture, tightness of credit, and the facility site risk. Moreover, the study disclosed that despite the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe and the developing world have great demand for the new financing techniques projects, these countries' contractors have almost no participation in the construction of these kind of projects.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction firms; participation; decision making; joint venture; marketing; project finance; owner; professional; market; Europe
Index terms: statistical model, international construction, marketing, innovative financing, owner, Europe, spatial distribution, joint venture, judgment, project finance, financing, questionnaire, decision-making, influential factor, software package, construction firm, construction company, stability, strategy
Subjects: software systems, structural engineering, physical geography and landforms, management, financial management, sociology, decision analysis, dispute resolution, organization, business, strategic management, risk assessment, data collection methods, economic analysis, data science, geographical analysis
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, International Construction, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here