Moore, D R (1996) Task difficulty assessment: a contribution towards improved buildability through simplification. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, UK.
Abstract
The assessment of buildability within the UK construction industry has typically been carried out on the basis of personal expertise, within which there may be many subjective considerations. This thesis examines the possibility of assessing buildability on the basis of objective criteria, and in an automated manner. A particular problem for buildability to address is identified as the UK construction industry's fragmented nature, particularly the separation between design process knowledge and construction process knowledge. The thesis identifies this separation as commencing during the Renaissance. The thesis examines a number of possible bases for the assessment of buildability, and concludes that task difficulty appears to be the most suitable basis to meet the objectives of the thesis. Various methods of assessing task difficulty in industries other than construction are evaluated, but none are found to be directly transferable to the assessment of difficulty within construction tasks. No pre-existing methods of assessing task difficulty within the construction industry were identified. The possibility of assessing buildability through an objective assessment of task difficulty measured in terms of operative skill represented within skill models is evaluated. Such skill models represent a new contribution to knowledge. The success of skill models is found to depend upon the application of general tolerance requirement theory, which supports the buildability attribute of tolerance requirements. Other buildability attributes are identified, but not examined in detail. The effect of various approaches to identifying and counting tolerance requirements on buildability assessment is considered and an algorithm is developed to guide the process. The research shows that objective assessment of buildability on the basis of tolerance requirements is possible, and that this can be carried out within a CAD environment at sketch design stage in an automated manner using a generic task approach to skill modelling.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildability; design process; UK |
| Index terms: | design process, buildability, construction process, design stage, modelling, construction industry, simplification, operative |
| Subjects: | management, building construction, design efficiency, industry analysis, design methods, practitioner, analytical methods, professional practice |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here