Pan, L-J (1996) A study of risk management in dealing with contracts in the construction industry. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
There is a consensus that the construction industry is subject to greater risk and uncertainty than other industries. Many studies of construction management and contract management have looked at risk management in major construction projects. However, most of these studies focussed on the client (buyer) rather than the contractor (seller), and most dealt with the engineering management of construction work rather than the managerial decision making process involved. This study concerns risk management by decision makers in contracting firms in the British construction industry. The purpose of this study is to examine how construction contractors perceive their decision making process in terms of risk perception and management. The study has gathered data and analysed it to examine four main hypotheses. Chapter One provides an overview of the literature on how individual buyers and business executives deal with perceived risk in general purchasing. Chapter Two examines the underlying theory of risk management in the construction industry to understand the principles and processes of risk management. Chapter Three describes the construction industry. Chapter Four introduces models of organisational buying behaviour and construction processes. Chapter Five demonstrates that the tendering stage constitutes an important area where the contractor applies risk management strategies. Chapter Six provides a discussion of the contract commitment stage. After considering relevant factors, 210 construction contractors operating in Britain were identified. A questionnaire, with a covering letter, was mailed directly to the Managing Director of the contractors included in the sample. From the sample, 101 sample contractors replied to yield a total of 76 useful responses. The 36.2% response rate was considered high enough to provide the data required for the purposes of this study. The research design and methods used for data collection and analysis are dealt with in Chapter Seven. The analysis of the data mainly has been presented in Chapter Eight. The results show that all the four hypotheses have been supported. Chapter Nine summarises the findings of the study with recommendations for further research. The results of the study indicate that: Construction companies perceive risks in their contracting process, and some situational factors affect the risk perception. Although risk analysis is relevant to the construction industry, rigorous analysis techniques such as sensitivity analysis, probability analysis, decision tree analysis, simulation approach, etc. are not widely applied in the contracting process, instead the more traditional techniques are still favoured for risk analysis. The tendering stage and the commitment stage are the critical stages for contract decision making. The tendering stage is the most important phase for applying risk management primarily through an effective bidding/negotiating approach. However, the final success of a construction project depends on the contractor's ability to manage the risk factors involved in the commitment stage. An inability to manage becomes a major source of risk in this stage.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; client; construction companies; contract management; contracting; decision making; probability analysis; purchasing; risk analysis; risk management; simulation; tendering; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | probability analysis, sensitivity analysis, contract management, strategy, risk perception, commitment, construction company, construction project, decision-making, construction process, questionnaire, negotiating, construction contractor, risk analysis, bidding, engineering management, research design, purchasing, decision-making process, construction work, risk management, risk factor, executive, decision tree, construction industry |
| Subjects: | bidding, operations management, psychology, practitioner, control systems, research design and methodology, organization, data collection methods, risk assessment, environmental hazards, statistical analysis, industry analysis, procurement strategy, building construction, decision analysis, conflict resolution, contract management, production management, management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Contract Administration, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here