Revadigar, S P (1996) Automated analysis of building seismic records. PhD thesis, University of Houston, USA.
Abstract
System identification has been used before for post-earthquake evaluation of building behavior. It invariably involves the matching of recorded acceleration-time histories to calculated time histories based on an assumed mathematical model. The matching is achieved by minimizing some measure of the difference between the two sets of time histories through the adjustment of the parameters of the assumed model. Frequently the minimization solution may not be physically sensible. Thus, intervention of an experienced user is needed to get a sensible solution by repeated trials. The work described herein is an automated method by which this iterative solution process is carried out without the intervention of a user. This is achieved by using an expert system that contains the knowledge and experience of the user. Current advancements in hardware technology allow the automatic recording and digitizing of seismic records using a personal computer (PC). With this automatic system identification method implemented on a PC-based recording system, it is possible to have the results of system identification minutes after the end of an earthquake event. This in turn lends itself to an automated damage assessment which is valuable in the absence of detailed on-site inspection by experienced engineers. A methodology of automated damage assessment is developed utilizing the results of system identification. Prior to an earthquake event, expert opinion on the various damage indicators or indices and their meaning pertaining to the particular building is collected and is input to a fuzzy logic inference machine. The machine in turn outputs a fuzzy language assessment of the degree of damage ranging from no damage to severe damage. The state-of-the-art of damage assessment based on recorded measurements does not yet render itself to a precise assessment. The output of the inference machine, however, serves a useful purpose as a preliminary assessment.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | earthquake; expert system; inspection; fuzzy logic; measurement |
| Index terms: | history, expert system, state of the art, methodology, meaning, mathematical model, minimization, acceleration, system-identification, hardware, damage assessment, earthquake, inspection, engineer, fuzzy logic |
| Subjects: | architectural and construction history, data science, mathematical modelling, research dissemination and communication, profession, computer hardware, sociology, project controls, data management, quality assurance, environmental hazards, systems engineering, algorithms, research methods, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here