Building design team communication: Practice and education

Whyte, A (1996) Building design team communication: Practice and education. PhD thesis, Robert Gordon University, UK.

Abstract

This study examined three propositions: - (i) there are problems in the building design team created by difficulties of communication between different professional disciplines, (ii) communication difficulties are primarily a function of cultural differences instilled by vocational education, and (iii) communication gaps require educational initiatives able to bridge cultural differences instilled by vocational traditions in the educational process. To achieve the most efficient process and ultimately a more effective product, building design team professionals must maximise their capacity for integrated activity and inter-professional communication. The nature of inter-professional relationships, and their development through the group formation process, is presented as a central consideration in the analysis of building design team communication. The rationale and methodological development of the study seeks to understand whether differences in inter-professional interaction are largely a matter of values and attitudes, and whether these can be modified by training to improve communication in the building design team. Research examines whether influencing positively professional attitudes at the formative stage addresses inter-disciplinary dissonance. This study establishes a link between education for the construction industry, and the adverse affects of perceived professional discord. This study goes beyond current conflictual opinion regarding the structure of specialised education for construction, and presents evidence that, handled correctly, future tertiary education can provide the most suitable antecedent for a more efficiently integrated building industry.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Pollock, R; Andrew, C A; Wilson, A; Donald, J and Baxter, S
Uncontrolled Keywords: education; vocation; building industry; building design; communication; training; professional
Index terms: building design, vocation, building industry, vocational education, construction industry, professional relationships, interaction, tertiary, cultural difference, evidence
Subjects: curriculum development, architectural design, specialized education, evaluation and assessment methods, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, cross-cultural studies, professional education, sociology
Topics: Research Practice, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Design Practice, Education
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here