Burleson, R C (1997) An analysis of multiskilled labor strategies in construction. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Abstract
The adequate supply of trained craft/trade workers and improved project cost performance are the most critical issues facing the construction industry today. All over the United States, contractors report difficulty in staffing projects with enough adequately trained, skilled workers to deliver construction services in a cost effective manner. The single-skilled labor strategy currently used by the construction industry is inefficient and may diminish the beneficial impact of many industry innovations. Advancements in computer aided management tools have increased our understanding of work processes and improved managerial decision capabilities, but they have not altered the way work is organized or performed in the field. Advancements in technology applications have improved the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of many field tasks, but have not delivered overall productivity/cost savings to warrant their widespread implementation. This research directly addresses the paradigm of the "single-skilled" craft worker that is prevalent throughout the unionized and non-unionized sectors of the U.S. construction industry. An analysis model is developed to measure the project performance impact of alternative labor utilization strategies. The economic model is used to analyze the impact of four distinct multiskill strategies on the construction of a $70 million petrochemical processing facility. Project benefits identified in this research which provide reductions in total labor costs include: reduced direct wages; improved project safety performance; reduced worker recruiting, screening, and orientation costs; reductions in small tools and personal protective equipment expenditures; and savings on payroll taxes and insurance. Resulting potential productivity improvements are also considered. Additional benefits accruing directly to the multiskilled employee include: increased earning potential (hourly wages and annual income), increased employment duration, and increased marketable skills. A review of existing literature on multiskilled labor strategies and a summary of anecdotal experiences in construction applications is also included in this research.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Haas, C T |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; duration; efficiency; market; protective equipment; skills; equipment; insurance; wages; employment; innovation; productivity; project cost; safety; employee; United States; project performance |
| Index terms: | cost saving, protective equipment, implementation, duration, construction industry, project performance, income, paradigm, personal protective equipment, insurance, labour cost, skilled worker, savings, screening, economic model, productivity, employment, critical issue, efficiency, safety performance, accuracy, project cost, strategy, labour utilization, wages, skilled labour, United States |
| Subjects: | performance management, economics, education and knowledge transfer, management, project management theory and practice, professional development, Geography, business economics, occupational health and safety management, project controls, cost management, industry analysis, risk assessment, modelling and simulation, economic analysis, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Time Control, Human Resources, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here