Corbett, D I (1997) Quantifying quality in industrial construction. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Abstract
Of the three primary objectives of the constructed project--cost, schedule, and quality--quality, is the most difficult to quantify. Although the extent to which budget constraints have been met can be measured in dollars; and how well a project met its schedule may be measured in days; the assurance of quality, in relation to the project owner expectations and satisfaction is a task that eludes even the most experienced and qualified construction or project manager. In this work, two (2) quantification methods are developed which may be offered as alternatives to the current, nebulous systems used to evaluate the outcome of construction projects. The Quality Index (QI) has been developed based on the empirical assessment by construction professionals of ten quality attributes which define quality. The Quality Grade (QG) is a more comprehensive assessment of quality in the constructed project, based on a weighted value system that has been assigned to actions and decisions that take place throughout the construction period based on literature references and standard industry practices. The terms and conditions in the contract documents, as well as the process used for prequalifying contractors, provide the basis for the survey questions used in compiling QG. Twenty-one industrial construction projects have been assessed according to the two quality quantification methods for the purposes of evaluating the relationship between QI and QG. As a result of the linear regression analysis performed with QG and QI serving as the independent and dependent variables, respectively, an R$\sp2$ value of 0.79 was obtained. Subsequently, a more detailed analysis is performed which further investigates how prevalent quality management methods and philosophy affect the achievement of a quality outcome in industrial construction. Finally, recommendations are made which prescribe a means of using historical data and anticipated project outcome to meet owner expectations and industry inspection and performance criteria as well as provide customer satisfaction.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Smith, G |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | philosophy; inspection; quality management; owner; project manager; quantification; regression analysis; construction project; professional |
| Index terms: | satisfaction, project manager, quantification, inspection, budget constraint, project outcome, owner, customer satisfaction, construction professional, regression analysis, quality management, industrial construction, performance criteria, philosophy, survey, contract document, construction project, dependent variable |
| Subjects: | professional development, service delivery, contractual condition, production management, performance measurement, statistical analysis, quality assurance, philosophical studies, measurement and scaling, sociology, building construction, project completion, profession, data collection methods, project delivery, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here