A hierarchical approach to the management of construction project risk

Dawson, P J (1997) A hierarchical approach to the management of construction project risk. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.

Abstract

The construction industry in Britain is undergoing a radical change; new markets are opening up as traditional ones close, and the nature of contracts are changing with the increasing popularity of design-build and the development of the Government's Private Finance Initiative. These changes have left many construction companies moving into markets in which they have little experience or entering into contracts which allocate risks to them which have previously been held by others. Since the traditional method of managing risks was by using the experience and judgment of managers, this has left many companies in a dangerous position, selecting projects with little knowledge of the risks the company is already exposed to, the extent to which the company wants the project, or the change that project will make to the risk profile. An investigation into the formal approach to risk management, developed over the last few decades as a way of progressing from the purely experience based approach, concludes that although several of the techniques offer an improvement, the overall approach does not consider the company. Projects are treated as independent entities rather than temporary parts of the company's ongoing activities. A system is produced which builds on the already identified organisational hierarchy of a company. Two risk models are produced, one for use at the project level, which considers the sources of uncertainty in the project, and one for use at the company level, which combines the uncertain impacts of the projects it is undertaking, those it is pursuing, and those which it expects will be available in the future. The models have been tested and validated using data collected from projects in their tendering stage. The results of the tests are presented and the findings discussed. Conclusions drawn from the work and recommendations for future work are presented.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction project; contracts; private finance; risk management; tendering; uncertainty
Index terms: investigation, risk management, markets, construction industry, judgment, private finance, construction project, private finance initiative, manager, construction company
Subjects: industry analysis, production management, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, dispute resolution, practitioner, organization, data collection methods, risk assessment
Topics: Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here