El-Diraby, T E-S (1997) System for evaluating bridge construction plans. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Abstract
The main objective of this research was to develop a mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of bridge construction plans during the design phase. A bridge construction plan (BCP) is a comprehensive plan for the construction of a new bridge that satisfies project defined objectives. The research developed a model that includes five major factors and 22 sub factors to evaluate BCP. It also includes specific definition of the evaluation sub factors, their data sources, and measurement techniques. In addition, the research proposed specific procedures for evaluating BCP within the bridge design process. The model was developed through observing large bridge construction sites and interviewing design and construction experts in owner, contracting, and consulting organizations. Additional experts' input showed that the proposed evaluation factors are meaningful, comprehensive, and applicable. Furthermore, it proved that the application of the model can have a positive impact on BCP effectiveness.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | O'Connor, J T |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | effectiveness; measurement; construction site; bridge construction; bridge design; owner; interview |
| Index terms: | bridge design, construction site, owner, design phase, effectiveness, interview, bridge construction, design and construction |
| Subjects: | performance management, sociology, infrastructure engineering, contractual arrangements, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, professional practice, work location |
| Topics: | Procurement, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here