Kulshrestha, M (1997) Total Value Control in Construction through Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.
Abstract
Construction is one of the largest industries in the world. It is the second largest economic activity in India, only next to agriculture, both in terms of the capital investment and manpower employment. It forms the very foundation of the nation's development and is a measure of its economy and progress. In India, a large number of construction projects are being implemented under the five-year plan programmes and a huge capital investment is being made in these projects. The spiralling construction costs and ever-increasing tightening of money have fostered a need for obtaining the full value of every rupee spent on these projects. Value Engineering is the technique, which is normally employed for this purpose. It analyses the value and reliably provides the essential performance of the project at the optimal cost. In this study, a purposeful attempt to look at value in a more scientific and realistic manner, has been made. Value has been viewed as one parameter, which encompasses the time, quality and cost components, the three vital factors of any construction project from control point of view. Total value control, in this study, includes the consideration of some non-economic attributes, such as functional and performance attributes to arrive at the optimum value. In this process, one encounters the complexity of the decision process by the conflicting multiplicity of these attributes. The study presents some concepts of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) to deal with the situation. Further, for this purpose, a value control implementation model involving multiple criteria decision-making techniques has been developed which replaces the present subjectivity in alternative evaluation by providing objectivity in subjective decision making. This model is implemented through specifically designed multiattribute action plan (MAAP) developed for this purpose. The model has been termed as "Multiple Criteria Value Management (MCVM)." In this study, two of the MCDM techniques namely, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy set methodology (FSM) have been discussed in detail supported by case studies/examples for the MCVM implementation. In the second aspect of the study, a matrix-based methodology for analysis in VE has been developed. The technique is capable of determining and/or verifying the basic function(s) of complex components of construction projects and provides with a means of separating those functions which are there in the element because of the present design approach. Thus, helping in identifying the potential areas for VE application in the system. Finally, to consider time component of value, a project monitoring system with the use of VE-MCDM combine has been developed. A case study of a school building construction project of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) has been included to illustrate the technique
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; fuzzy set; subjectivity; construction cost; construction project; capital investment; decision making; employment; investment; manpower; monitoring; value engineering; value management; India; analytical hierarchy process; case study |
| Index terms: | monitoring, value management, economic activity, India, analytical hierarchy process, implementation, optimal cost, case study, construction cost, employment, fuzzy set, decision process, construction project, school building, methodology, decision-making, complexity, project monitoring, capital investment, value engineering, subjectivity, programme |
| Subjects: | bidding, contractual arrangements, financial and cost management, economic analysis, data collection methods, construction type, control systems, human factors and perception, value management, project controls, decision analysis, decision-making and optimization, systems engineering, management, research methods, production management, Geography |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Human Resources, Value Management, Time Control, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here