A generic LCCA algorithm for pavement management decisions

Delwar, M (1998) A generic LCCA algorithm for pavement management decisions. PhD thesis, Washington State University, USA.

Abstract

This thesis describes the development of a software package designed for life-cycle cost analysis of roadway pavements. It considers two streams of costs, those of the agency and those of the user. Agency costs are a function of the type of rehabilitation, restoration, resurfacing or reconstruction (i.e., 4-R) treatment applicable to each pavement type, given its surface distress and structural condition. User costs include vehicle operating costs and non-vehicle operating costs, which are a function of pavement roughness, as well as user delay costs due to the lane closures necessary for the pavement 4-R activities. The network level analysis flags sections in order of decreasing user benefit cost ratio, where benefit is the reduction in user costs from its current roughness to the roughness of a new pavement and cost is the agency's cost for the most capital intensive 4-R treatment. Sections flagged at the network level are carried forward to the project level analysis. The project level analysis allocates the available budget among the sections that were selected at the project level to maximize user benefits over the analysis period. The key element of this software package, named Pavement Investment Decisions (PID), is that it is generic, which means that it is specially designed to be adaptable to the practices of various State Departments of Transportation (DOT). It utilizes a visual interface that allows customizing of the software to fit the pavement management database and the pavement management practices of any State. The pavement management database of the Washington State DOT was used to implement and pilot test PID.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Papagiannakis, T
Uncontrolled Keywords: investment; rehabilitation; cost analysis; pavement
Index terms: agency, restoration, management decision, management practice, stream, software package, customizing, cost analysis, investment decision, operating cost, database, reconstruction, distress
Subjects: construction manufacturing, financial and cost management, economic analysis, data management, building construction, sociology, management, renovation and retrofit, structural engineering, software systems, decision-making and reasoning, water management
Topics: Digital Applications, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here