A cross-culture analysis of construction practice through knowledge events

Xiao, H and Boyd, D (2007) A cross-culture analysis of construction practice through knowledge events. In: Boyd, D (ed.) Proceedings of 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2007, Belfast, UK.

Abstract

It has long been believed that culture causes differences in construction practice in different countries. Few practical cross cultural studies have been conducted in construction due to the complexity, richness, abstractness and subtlety of national differences. Culture is a disputed concept whose meaning depends on the context of its use. Knowledge-Event Management (KEM), using audio diaries to capture knowledge events and debriefing to analyse and transfer knowledge, has been chosen to enquiry into construction practice in different countries as it accesses deep knowledge in practice. It is proposed that those real-life knowledge events contain rich contents from which not only the embedded tacit knowledge can be extracted and then shared but also some national differences in cultural pattern of learning and practicing may be detected. This paper presents two typical knowledge events collected from construction professionals in Britain and China respectively and uses a cross-culture lens to identify differences in people’s thinking and learning as well as their practice in construction. The findings present evidence of different national construction practices and link these to cultural differences. This will surface learning to assist international projects and for the learning of international students.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge event; cross-culture; construction practice
Index terms: diary, construction professional, evidence, China, international project, tacit knowledge, complexity, meaning, cultural difference
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, strategic management, systems engineering, cross-cultural studies, sociology, professional development, Geography
Topics: International Construction, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here