A multi-agent collaborative framework for concurrent design of constructed facilities

Halfawy, M M R (1998) A multi-agent collaborative framework for concurrent design of constructed facilities. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, USA.

Abstract

The need to adopt an integrated approach in the facility design and construction process has been widely recognized in the construction industry and academia. The complexity and scope of integrated construction projects typically require the collaboration of a number of design and construction companies to accomplish the project. The primary goal of this dissertation is to develop and implement a concurrent engineering methodology and a computational infrastructure that would enable these companies to share and exchange design and construction information, support the interoperability of their heterogeneous and distributed software systems, and to support the collaboration of the geographically distributed project team members. We have developed the DesignShare framework to support the requirements to implement concurrent facility design environments. The framework computational model defines the architecture, tools, and techniques to support the implementation and deployment of a concurrent engineering methodology in construction projects. The framework addresses the specific characteristics of the facility design domain, supports the reuse of existing software tools in this domain, and develops efficient integration mechanisms. The DesignShare approach provides the mechanisms to integrate the project team members, to integrate the information models of different disciplines, and to support the interoperation of heterogeneous software tools. The framework defines a three-layer architecture. The top layer, called the applications layer, provides the design team members with function-specific software tools to perform activities such as structural design/analysis. The second layer, called the concurrent engineering services layer, defines three main components: the design process modeling and management component, the design information modeling and management component, and the team collaboration component. The second component includes a 3D modeling and visualization sub-component to support the visual representation and manipulation of design information. The lower level layer, called the infrastructure layer, provides basic computing and communication services. We have implemented a prototype environment based on the framework. The scope of the prototype environment is the preliminary design of steel I-girder and concrete box girder bridges. We have conducted an evaluation of the framework and the prototype environment. The evaluation from domain experts' perspective has indicated satisfactory results. The evaluation criteria have primarily addressed the concepts and techniques employed by the framework as well as the utility and performance of the prototype bridge design environment.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Hadipriono, F C and Duane, J W
Uncontrolled Keywords: complexity; project team; 3D modeling; bridge design; collaboration; communication; computing; concurrent engineering; integration; interoperability; reuse; visualization; bridge; construction project
Index terms: information modelling, bridge design, construction industry, implementation, 3D modelling, modelling, dissertation, interoperability, project team, concurrent engineering, design and construction, academia, prototype, design team, girder, integrated approach, computational model, design process, team collaboration, agent, visualization, complexity, structural design, preliminary design, methodology, integration, collaboration, construction project, computing
Subjects: collaborative management, systems and processes, systems engineering, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, educational institutions, organizational analysis, digital design, production management, research methods, engineering methods, management, design practice, structural engineering, project delivery, analytical methods, professional practice, contractual arrangements, modelling and simulation, design methods, computing systems, practitioner, computational design, research dissemination and communication, architectural engineering
Topics: Procurement, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Education, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here