Jones, B K (1998) A model for collaborative engineering the construction industry. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, UK.
Abstract
The research undertaken in this study is concerned with modelling a computer-based environment where design problems that impact architects, engineers and construction managers can be solved collaboratively. The thesis conceptualises a computer-based system in which construction management computer agents work concurrent with design computer agents to assist the principle designer produce the best design that can be efficiently constructed. The focus is on the decision-making processes of architects, engineers and construction managers. A comprehensive literature review and company survey supported the author's own experience that the integrated way of working to produce a constructable design had degenerated to a point where many inefficiencies can now be attributed to the poor collaboration amongst project participants. Data was collected from companies whose expertise lay in one of three areas; competitive bid contracting, design build or companies such as petro-chemical who traditionally managed both design and manufacture. Construction managers, architects and engineers were interviewed. The study concentrates on new concepts and emerging computer-based technologies. It combines theory, technology and application from concurrent engineering, knowledge engineering, distributed computing, object-oriented modelling and the concept of computer agents. Reference is also made to current practice in other manufacturing industries, where the manufacturing process strongly influences design definition. Finally, scenarios of typical design problems were used to measure and compare the effect of making decisions in either the traditional sequential method associated with competitive bidding, in a system where there is some concurrent decision making and in the collaborative computer-based system proposed. The final result is a design process that belongs to a multiple-disciplined team where all contributors have the opportunity to influence the resulting design solution. Much of the construction management problem solving carried out at pre-construction stages of the project can be collaboratively considered. This research has proved that a computer-based environment which facilitates collaborative problem solving among all project participants is possible. The model proposed also ensures that the present geographically distributed structure of construction organisations can be accommodated; it can also be extended to other participating domains.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; collaboration; computing; concurrent engineering; construction stages; decision making; manufacturing; problem solving; design process; interview; object-oriented modelling |
| Index terms: | construction organization, engineer, manufacturing process, decision-making process, pre-construction, designer, concurrent engineering, architect, modelling, construction industry, construction stages, interview, design process, object-oriented modelling, competitive bidding, design build, computer-based environment, manufacturing industry, literature review, survey, decision-making, collaboration, computing, construction manager, problem solving, agent, bidding |
| Subjects: | management, manufacturing engineering, software systems, decision-making and reasoning, engineering methods, industry analysis, digital infrastructure, decision analysis, design methods, computing systems, practitioner, profession, data collection methods, organization, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, bidding, project delivery, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here