Puddicombe, M S (1998) Interorganizational project strategy: contracts, contacts, and performance in the building industry. PhD thesis, Boston University, USA.
Abstract
The incidence of organizations characterized by multi-firm collaboration and a project focus is increasing. These interorganizational project (IP) forms can be seen as one response to the turbulent and hypercompetitive environments in which many firms now exist. The emergence of these forms is particularly relevant in the operations arena where the use of an IP form introduces a host of concerns that operation's strategy research has not addressed. Operations strategy has conceived of the use of multiple firms and projects as options available when addressing traditional strategic decision areas. I proposed that these options represent a more fundamental choice. They position an organization in a typology of operational forms defined by dimensions of organizational domain and technology. IP forms occupy a quadrant of this typology, where existing strategy models find limited applicability. The dissertation proposed and tested a model of IP strategy informed by theories from traditional management theory, organizational economics, and new product development. The research design was a variation on an embedded multiple case design, with the number of cases (108) being much higher and the depth of analysis more focused than is the norm. It examined the antecedents and the outcomes of formal and informal interorganizational structures in order to identify the determinants of performance in an interorganizational project environment. The major findings occurred in three areas. (1) Behavioral and transaction uncertainties drive the choice of formal contractual structure. (2) The formal organizational structure is important early in the project, but it is supplanted by the informal structure that results from interpersonal learning. (3) The timing of interorganizational collaboration is important, with joint action during production being more effective for complex projects.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | management theory; collaboration; contracts; learning; emergence; organizational economics; organizational structure |
| Index terms: | emergence, management theory, collaboration, variation, project strategy, strategy, organizational structure, option, dimension, complex project, dissertation, determinant, organizational economics, new product development, building industry, research design, interorganizational |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, systems engineering, sociology, decision analysis, contractual condition, management, economics, health monitoring assessment and metrics, strategic project management, innovation studies, risk assessment, research dissemination and communication, research design and methodology, business |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here