Spiteri, J (1998) A critical analysis of occupational and organisational strategy in UK: architectural and quantity surveying practices. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
Abstract
The research study was an analysis of occupational and organisational strategy in UK private architectural and quantity surveying practices. The premise of the study was that the analysis of strategy within a professional context warrants concurrent attention to both the occupational as well as the organisational dimensions of strategy. The occupational aspect of strategy was explored through a framework derived from the concept of professionalism. Professional power was explored with respect to dimensions associated with the knowledge base of a profession and the characteristics of consumers of professional power. The concept of occupational segments was developed to account for the differential distribution of professional power within a profession. Strategic group theory provided the basis to investigate the organisational strategy aspect. A 'strategic group' refers to a set of firms pursuing the same or similar organisational strategies. To operationalise the strategy group concept, a rationale for the selection of the grouping and the external validation dimensions was developed from the competency based strategy and strategic adaptation fields. The integration of the occupational and organisational perspectives permitted an analysis of the effectiveness of different organisational strategies in extracting the potential leverage inherent within the various occupational segments. Data were gathered by survey questionnaire from UK private architectural and quantity surveying practices (n=308) included in the 1994 versions of RIBA Directory of Practices and the RICS Directory of Practices. The main survey was carried out in 1996. The questionnaire was designed to have relevance to both professions and provided data on dimensions that had concurrent validity in both professions. The major contributions of this study are the development of a general framework for formulating, interpreting and validating occupational segments and strategic groups, the analysis of the interactive effects of occupational and organisational strategy dimensions, and the performance implications of segment and group membership. The main conclusion was that the performance of the strategic groups was contingent on the occupational segment and that no general formula may be applied to the power-knowledge translation.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | performance; professionalism; quantity surveying; effectiveness; UK |
| Index terms: | professionalism, integration, validation, questionnaire, strategy, survey, knowledge base, organizational strategy, quantity surveying practice, surveying, dimension, profession, effectiveness, validity, adaptation |
| Subjects: | performance management, management, professional development, organizational analysis, information systems, business, user focus, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, profession, institututions, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here