The use of artificial neural networks for modelling buildability in preliminary structural design

Ballal, T M A (1999) The use of artificial neural networks for modelling buildability in preliminary structural design. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.

Abstract

The construction industry has long been criticised for the manner in which parties involved in a construction project communicate. Since the early 1960s a number of reports, commissioned by the UK governmental agencies, have highlighted a fundamental malaise in the industry: the lack of integration between design and construction processes. This chronic enigma has manifested itself in cost overruns, prolonged durations, poor quality and complex designs. Buildability and design for construction have emerged as key drivers for improving project objectives. Despite considerable progress in identifying the generic concepts ofbuildability, similar progress in its implementation, particularly during the preliminary structural design stage is still in its infancy. This implementation requires a framework for knowledge acquisition of construction information for use by designers. However, there is currently minimal documented experience in capturing technical information, construction expertise and knowledge implicit in previously completed projects for the benefits of new ones. The focus of this research is to develop computerised models for acquiring construction knowledge from past projects to integrate buildability considerations into the preliminary structural design process. A novel artificial intelligence approach has been adopted in this study. Five Artificial Neural Network models have been developed. These allow the generation of an expeditious solution for given sets of design and buildability constraints. Once information is entered into the developed models, a recommendation of which structural scheme to choose is generated instantaneously. Thus, valuable design time is released allowing designers the opportunity to invest this in performing other equally important design tasks. The input information to the models consists of site-related information including site access; availability of working space; and speed of erection, and conceptual design information including type of building; and number of storeys. Four of the five models achieved a high level of accuracy in the range of 81% to 95%. Preliminary structural design is a complex process which relies heavily upon past experience and intuition. These characteristics cannot be represented by the use of conventional computational techniques and only those that are capable of generalising the knowledge implicit in past projects can be of real benefit. In this research, it has been demonstrated that the aforementioned characteristics of structural design fall naturally into the Artificial Neural Networks' problem domain.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildability; construction project; duration; government; integration; structural design; designer
Index terms: artificial neural network, accuracy, buildability, structural design, intuition, conceptual design, agency, construction project, integration, designer, cost overrun, artificial intelligence, duration, construction industry, implementation, modelling, knowledge acquisition, design and construction, technical information
Subjects: design practice, professional development, technology management, production management, sociology, cognitive psychology, project controls, organizational analysis, student development, industry analysis, design efficiency, architectural engineering, profession, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, artificial intelligence
Topics: Procurement, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Education, Time Control, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here