The IMechE/IEE model forms of contract: an investigation into the history and development of the forms, with particular reference to the allocation of contractual risk, including a survey of the industry's perception (BL)

Gaitskell, R (1999) The IMechE/IEE model forms of contract: an investigation into the history and development of the forms, with particular reference to the allocation of contractual risk, including a survey of the industry's perception (BL). PhD thesis, King's College London, UK.

Abstract

This thesis investigates the creation and development of the model forms of contact produced by the Institution of Electrical Engineers and the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. This investigation commences at the turn of the century and extends to the present time, mid-1997, when the current model forms are being revised in the light of the Latham Report and the recently enacted Housing Grants. Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. In particular, the inquiry into the evolutionary process by which the forms have developed is intended to reveal whether this process results in a satisfactory allocation of the contractual risks between the parties concerned. By contrast, certain recently produced standard forms have been created ab initio.The starting point is the creation of the form in the period 1900-1903. (This includes reference to Robert Hammond, the individual who conceived the idea of such a model form and arranged for its production.) Thereafter, an overview is given of the development of the range of forms in the period 1903-1983, although the focus is on the evolution of the primary form, 'A'.The production of the completely revised primary form, now known as MF/l, in the period 1983-1988 is considered in detail, with particular attention being paid to the debate on key clauses, as the various interest groups within the industry sought to influence the allocation of contractual risk.The thesis concludes with a survey of current views as to standard/model forms. In particular, opinions as to MF/1 and the Latham proposals are assessed.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: NO MATCHING KEYWORDS
Index terms: investigation, form of contract, proposal, survey, history, interest group, Latham, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, housing grant, evolution, electrical engineer, mechanical engineer
Subjects: project planning, economic analysis, sociology, environmental science, industry policy reports, statutes, profession, architectural and construction history, contractual arrangements, data collection methods
Topics: Project Management, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Governance, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here