International construction management: the cultural dimension

Hall, M A (1999) International construction management: the cultural dimension. PhD thesis, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.

Abstract

Cultural differences at the national level are a challenge for all companies operating beyond their own national borders. They change the way business is done in the most fundamental ways. A subject thoroughly researched in other fields, the literature indicates that, beyond a small number of very specific studies, there is a paucity of research into the impact and effects of cultural differences on the international construction industry. The international construction industry began with the Victorian railway magnates but, today, has become a sophisticated, global market, with construction enterprises operating in both developing and developed countries worldwide. When this is seen in light of the complex, project-based arrangements involved in production of the built environment, the potential impact of national cultural differences is, arguably, more pronounced than in any other industry. From the literature, it was established that while the cultural dimension is recognised as being important within the international construction industry, there was no mention of how culture is considered at either the operational or strategic level beyond anecdote. Thus, the research sought to establish the ways in which both British expatriate construction professionals, and the companies for whom they work, respond to the cultural dimension. A questionnaire, comprising both qualitative and quantitative elements, was devised to gather the views of British construction professionals working outside the UK. This was supplemented by interviews with key decision-makers in eight, diverse construction enterprises, all of which had operations outside Britain. It was found that both British construction expatriates and the companies they work for adopted an ethnocentric response to the differences that they encountered when working overseas. However, while the expatriates were moving towards a more synergistic approach, the companies (both consultancies and contractors) were moving towards parochialism. It is argued that in an increasingly globalised and culturally diverse market, both at home and overseas, British construction enterprises will need to focus far more on the esoteric aspects of their business, such as culture, to maintain their competitive edge. One of the organisations studied was identified as epitomising 'best practice' in their treatment of cultural diversity, and their approach is recommended as a way to manage cultural differences throughout the industry.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: best practice; built environment; railway; contractor; professional; market; interview
Index terms: consultancy, questionnaire, British expatriate, cultural difference, developing and developed country, interview, dimension, built environment, international construction, construction professional, best practice, international construction industry
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, cross-cultural studies, professional development, economic development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, strategic management, data collection methods, organization, business
Topics: Organizational Design, International Construction, Urban Studies, Information Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here