Han, S H (1999) Risk-based go/no-go decision making model for international construction projects: The cross-impact analysis approach. PhD thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA.
Abstract
The world economy is becoming more global due to agreements such as the "Uruguay Round" in GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade). The globalization of the world construction industry provides tremendous opportunities for contractors to expand into new foreign markets. However, the international construction market is dramatically different from the domestic market. It involves all of the uncertainties common to domestic construction projects as well as risks specific to international transactions. Consequently, in contrast with the globalization trend, only 19% of the "Top 400 U.S. Contractors" actively seek international contracts. Moreover, despite the complexity and difficulty, the majority of construction firms have typically entered international markets based on personal intuition or previous experience, both of which are easily influenced by biases that distort the firms' perception of reality. This thesis focuses on developing a formalized "risk-based Go/No-Go decision making model" for contractors who wish to expand into international construction markets. The Go/No-Go decision model basically applies the Cross-Impact Analysis (CIA) method to assess the various uncertainties associated with international construction. This model consists of three parts: (1) the conceptual hierarchical model for the global explanation of a Go/No-Go decision, (2) the CIA causal relationship model to quantitatively analyze the project conditions, and (3) the multi-criteria decision making tool for combining multiple project outcomes. This research draws significant findings regarding the benefits of the Go/No-Go decision model from case studies by 56 participants. With the Go/No-Go decision model, decision makers can make better decisions by improving correctness, enhancing confidence, reducing difficulty, helping decision formulation, and increasing consistency, etc. Other major contributions in this research include the establishment of the most appropriate approach to develop a Go/No-Go decision model, the extensions of the CIA method applicable to this research domain, the conceptualization of the multi-sequential decision processes for the whole phases of entry decisions, and other valuable research findings. These include: the descriptive reasons for wrong Go/No-Go decisions, the investigation of the most critical factors in a Go/No-Go decision, the evaluation of decision consistency, and the discovery of risk aversion in the selection of international construction projects, etc.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Diekmann, J E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; construction firms; construction project; globalization; international construction project; markets; decision making; bias; market; case studies |
| Index terms: | construction firm, globalization, decision-making, bias, construction project, impact analysis, complexity, international construction project, intuition, Uruguay, case study, becoming, decision process, project outcome, domestic construction, critical factor, international market, investigation, international construction, agreements, construction industry, markets |
| Subjects: | organization, project completion, data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, strategic management, contract formation, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, development economics, probability and distributions, production management, Geography, cognitive psychology, decision analysis, economic factors, systems engineering, philosophical process, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, International Construction, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here