Risk analysis of cost and schedule of complex engineering systems

Nyakaana Blair, A M A (1999) Risk analysis of cost and schedule of complex engineering systems. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.

Abstract

Risk is inherent in engineering systems. A kernel element of risk that requires adequate treatment is uncertainty represented by plural outcomes and associated future likelihoods. This research examines treatment of uncertainty and provides methodologies for risk analysis of cost and schedule of complex engineering systems. The uncertainty intrinsic in a system influences requisite risk analysis methodology. Probabilistic, ambiguous, or aleatory uncertainty entails stochastic methods. Cognitive, vague, or epistemic uncertainty requires fuzzy sets and logic. Simulation overcomes difficulty, or known intractability, associated with mathematical formulation of analytical models of complex engineering systems. Methodology for fuzzy stochastic risk analysis by simulation of cost and schedule networks is provided. Engineering decisions involving risk require decision models with systematic frameworks to consider pertinent facets of decision problems. Methodology covering continuous, discrete, static, and dynamic aspects of problems for risk-based decision analysis is provided. Classical decision analysis assumes probabilities associated with consequences are known numerically. With complex engineering systems, available probabilities can be unreliable, incomplete, or imprecise and be known as fuzzy rather than crisp numbers. Methodology for the use of fuzzy probabilities in decision analysis is given. A systematic framework consisting of influence diagrams and decision trees is used to incorporate distributions associated with discrete or continuous probabilities and consequences. Dynamic decision models are given that change over time by the updating of variables as additional information is acquired. Fuzzy-Bayesian methodology is presented for updating the state-of-knowledge of cost and schedule information as it is piecewise accumulated and for determination of the value of additional information before acquisition. This research provides a generalized methodology for risk analysis of cost and schedule of complex engineering systems. Methodology includes simulation of deterministic, stochastic, fuzzy, and fuzzy stochastic activities in networks with nodes combining AND, IOR, or EOR entrances and deterministic or stochastic exits. Methodology is given for risk-based decision analysis covering continuous, discrete, static, and dynamic aspects of a decision problem, and using fuzzy-Bayesian methods for updating information and determining the value of information. Methodology provided is general, covering all kinds of uncertainty, and is validated by examples and selected case studies.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Ayyub, B M
Uncontrolled Keywords: fuzzy set; uncertainty; risk analysis; decision analysis; risk analysis; simulation
Index terms: methodology, risk analysis, analytical model, case study, decision analysis, acquisition, fuzzy set, decision tree
Subjects: research methods, theoretical framing, environmental hazards, decision-making and optimization, decision analysis, business, data collection methods
Topics: Risk Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here