Ahmed, M U (2000) ‘Champions of collaboration’ in collaborative technological innovation. PhD thesis, Simon Fraser University, Canada.
Abstract
Rapid technological change, globalization, increasing competition and concerns about sustainability have changed the nature of technological innovation processes with the result that these activities are less often confined to a single firm. Thus, there is a growing demand for someone to foster collaboration. This prompted the question: how do these individuals foster collaborative technological innovation (CTI)? The steps of collaborative technological innovation at the firm level generally include recognition of an opportunity, idea generation, problem solving, and implementation/diffusion of the technology. Each stage and its activities require a different mix of individuals and their contributions. When the mix includes people from different organizations, getting these people to work together effectively requires someone with special skills. We call these people “champions of collaboration.” This study advances our understanding of these people by building hypotheses that explain how “champions of collaboration” foster interorganizational research and development collaboration in Japanese firms. A case study research strategy is applied to this research, and seven hypotheses are developed. Of these, four were found to be unique in the existing literature. (H 1) Champions of Collaboration (CoC) contribute to a form of advanced market awareness and innovation project initiation called “ demand articulation.” (H 2) CoC contribute to the selection of partner(s) by considering the goals for the collaboration and the fit (person-to-person, time, strategic, organizational, functional) between their own firm and the target firm or organization. (H 3) CoC help to set collaborative research and development agendas for technological innovation. (H 4) CoC motivate researcher(s) and developer(s) within their own and partner firms. The research suggests that “senkennomei” (long-term perspective), “shinnen” (conviction), along with passion, persistence, coordination, and negotiation skills are key personality characteristics that enable the champion of collaboration to foster collaboration in technological innovation. Additionally, a CoC emerges at various stages of a CTI and different individuals may play this role at different times as they work collaboratively with others within and outside their organizations. This thesis provides some directions for practitioners who wish to optimize technological innovation processes through collaboration, and makes several recommendations for further research in the area.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Smith, R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competition; coordination; market; skills; sustainability; technological change; technological innovation; collaboration; globalization; innovation; negotiation; problem solving; case study; developer |
| Index terms: | collaboration, research and development, competition, problem solving, globalization, practitioner, strategy, implementation, coordination, negotiation, technological innovation, technological change, personality, interorganizational, case study |
| Subjects: | innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, innovation studies, practitioner, data collection methods, business, behavioral psychology, economic factors, market analysis, conflict resolution, research management, management, decision-making and reasoning |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, International Construction, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here