Chandra, V and Loosemore, M (2008) Cultural learning during briefing: A facilities management perspective. In: Dainty, A (ed.) Proceedings of 24th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2008, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
Background: Outsourced Facilities Management (FM) has been noted to be problematic in terms of understanding clients' needs. An understanding of these needs inevitably requires an understanding of the hospital’s organisational culture, where the 'value' for FM rests. Method: Using a hospital partnering project as a case study, it investigates the process of learning about culture, an approach which has traditionally been treated as a black box. Nonaka’s concept of externalisation helps portray cultural learning as the process of interpreting project-related knowledge by the Hospital and FM groups. Laukkanen's Comparative Cause Mapping method further compares the groups' interpretations over time. Result: It was found that a majority of interpretations on project-knowledge were collectively learned, largely supported by early exposure to those differences. Unlearning and non-learning were also evident where the groups' previous anticipation of those problems was inadequate, or when the emerging problems impinged upon their own goals and interests. Conclusion: Early collaborations between the groups through partnering approach and "creative chaos" in the form of problems and disagreements at the initial briefing stage provide opportunities for cultural learning. With this, sound technical knowledge and openness created a trusting environment that persuaded compromise were factors supporting cultural learning.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cultural learning; externalisation; hospital briefing; partnering; strategic facilities management |
| Index terms: | collaboration, mapping, organizational culture, briefing, exposure, facilities management, case study, partnering |
| Subjects: | scope management, data collection methods, sociology, partnership management, spatial and geospatial analysis, public and environmental health, management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here