Ghulman, B A (2000) Predicting construction cost growth in ODOT's paving projects using information available at the bidding time. PhD thesis, Oklahoma State University, USA.
Abstract
Scope and method of study. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that may cause cost growth in Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) paving projects, determine the relationship among the factors, and develop a statistical model to predict the amount of cost growth based on the factors. Two questionnaires were developed and distributed to ODOT engineers and highway contractors to collect data to identify factors that may cause cost growth. An analysis was performed on the collected data to determine a final list of cost factors. Project information related to the cost factors was collected and analyzed to determine the relationship among the factors. A statistical model was then developed to predict the amount of cost growth for ODOT paving projects based on the information available at the bidding time. Findings and conclusions. The analysis of the participants' responses to the questionnaires identified 33 factors that may lead to cost growth in ODOT paving projects. Of the 33 factors, 22 were unique to ODOT engineers, 28 unique to contractors, and 17 related to both groups. “Project size” was found to be the most influencing factor according to engineers, whereas “availability of labor” was found to be the most influencing factor according to contractors. Information related to 22 factors was found in ODOT files on each of the 266 paving projects involved in the study. These 22 cost factors were used in the analysis as independent variables. Principal components analysis, factor analysis, and regression analysis were performed. The analysis indicated that 8 of the 22 factors were found to be significant in predicting the cost growth of ODOT paving projects. The factors were ratio of projects with overrun, average overrun, average cost growth, contract amount, project duration, number of bids, contract difference ratio, and resident engineer. The first 3 factors apply to “contractor”, the fourth and fifth apply to “project size”, the sixth and seventh apply to “bidding environment”, and the eighth factor applies to “resident engineer”. The factors related to the “contractor” were found to have the most impact on cost growth followed by “project size”, “bidding environment”, and “resident engineer” respectively. A numerical model was then developed based on the 8 predictor variables to predict the amount of cost growth in ODOT paving projects using information available at the bidding time.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Oberlender, G D |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | duration; construction cost; highway; bidding; factor analysis; regression analysis; |
| Index terms: | cost factor, construction cost, independent variable, numerical model, engineer, influencing factor, resident engineer, regression analysis, statistical model, duration, factor analysis, overrun, paving, bidding, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | project controls, transportation engineering, statistical analysis, economics, modelling and simulation, data science, bidding, financial and cost management, data collection methods, profession, risk assessment, practitioner |
| Topics: | Time Control, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here