Kalampakorn, S (2000) Stages of construction workers' use of hearing protection. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, USA.
Abstract
The use of hearing protection such as ear plugs and ear muffs can reduce noise exposure and the risk of noise-induced hearing loss, the most common occupational hazard faced by workers (Sarell & Toothman, 1987). Unfortunately, a previous study found that construction workers, a population with the highest rates of work-related injury and illness in the U.S., are at high risk for noise-induced hearing loss with low rates of hearing protection use (16 to 49% during times needed) (Lusk, Kerr, & Kauffman, 1998). A promising approach to better understanding factors influencing hearing protection use involves the application of the stages of change from the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1982). The purposes of this study were to examine the application of the stages of change construct of the Transtheoretical Model to the behavior of hearing protection use in association with components of the Health Promotion Model (Pender, 1996) and to assess the effects of the stages of change at pre-test on the post-test use and post-test intention to use hearing protection. Using the existing data from an intervention study, the stages of change and their relationship with perceived benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, situational influences, and interpersonal influences of hearing protection use were assessed in 264 Mid-Western U.S. construction workers. Results indicated that most of the construction workers in this study were in the preparation stage of hearing protection use (68.6%) and fewest in the action stage (4.2%). Individuals in different stages differed significantly on most variables and in the direction predicted by the Transtheoretical Model, e.g., those in the action and maintenance stages had lower scores on perceived barriers to hearing protection use than those in the preparation, contemplation, and precontemplation stages. Discriminant function analyses showed that interpersonal influences (modeling), perceived benefits (value of use), and perceived barriers were the strongest predictors of stages of hearing protection use. Analyses of covariance also suggested that stages of change at pre-test affected post-test use and post-test intention to use hearing protection. These findings have implications for designing interventions using stage of change construct to increase construction workers' use hearing protection.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Lusk, S L |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | population; injury; noise; construction worker; health and safety |
| Index terms: | self-efficacy, modelling, construction worker, illness, discriminant function analysis, exposure, health promotion, population, noise-induced hearing loss, occupational hazard, behaviour change, health and safety, injury |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, health risk and incident analysis, public and environmental health, behavioral psychology, statistical analysis, demography, health conditions and diseases, human factors and perception, practitioner, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here