Williams, L M (2000) Strategic decision support for project portfolio management in the public sector. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Abstract
This study addresses the problem of managing multiple large-scale public sector projects, in particular those whose execution will stretch over several time periods. Public projects are usually financed with funds from several sources, each with restrictions as to how the funds may be used. The funds may be restricted to use on a specific project, to specific types of cost or to be used with matching funds from another source. Also of interest is the option in certain cases to leverage the provided funds by issuing bonds. Additionally, the exact amount of income in future years is often unknown as politics, decisions by other agencies, or the economy can have an effect on the future budget. The objective of public planners is to complete the projects in as timely a manner as possible, however, it is difficult to determine which project should have higher priority when tradeoffs are necessary due to budget restrictions. There are several aspects of this problem that make it interesting and difficult. Both integrality requirements and stochastic elements are present, making modeling the problem and obtaining a solution more difficult. The integer nature of the problem is due to the requirement to choose exactly one schedule for each project under consideration. The stochastic elements come from the unknown nature of the future budgets. The methodologies presented here are designed to analyze situations in which multiple projects are being simultaneously managed over multiple time periods. They are related in structure to three classic operations research problems, the capital rationing problem, the resource constrained project scheduling problem, and the stochastic financial portfolio problem. Several models, each addressing different aspects of the problem, are presented here. Integer programming, column generation and multistage stochastic programming with recourse are the techniques used in the development of this set of decision support models. This study was motivated by a large public sector agency application that involved multiple related construction projects with severe funding constraints and complicated funding source restrictions. Data from this case problem is used to illustrate the application of these methods.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Karmarkar, U S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support; income; funding; politics; programming; public sector; scheduling; construction project |
| Index terms: | programming, methodology, construction project, public project, operations research, agency, scheduling, decision support, project scheduling, column, tradeoff, planner, funding, income, option, integer programming, modelling, portfolio management, politics, public sector |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, analytical methods, operations research, programming, design methods, profession, administrative law, political science, project controls, decision analysis, sociology, production management, infrastructure engineering, structural engineering, algorithms, research methods |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here