An information model for improving design coordination in building projects

Zaneldin, E (2000) An information model for improving design coordination in building projects. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada.

Abstract

Engineering design is a complex multidisciplinary process often constrained by time and money. The success of this process is highly dependent upon effective coordination among the diverse design teams involved. Despite its importance, coordination is neither simple nor error free and at present relies primarily on manual methods of cross checking. Such practice can thus be characterized as slow, costly, and ineffective. It is the objective of this research, therefore, to re-engineer the design process utilizing the recent advances in information technology and computer applications in order to facilitate coordination and increase productivity. The novelty of this research is in the development of a comprehensive model for efficiently representing multidisciplinary design information, recording design rationale, and facilitating the management of design changes. The model incorporates a unified hierarchical representation of the multidisciplinary design information. Building components are designed as intelligent objects that encapsulate their design rationale and appropriate communication paths. These components are able to automatically communicate any changes in their data to affected parties. The design rationale is represented for each component by recording the description of desired performance criteria, the minimum and maximum performance values, and the dependency relationships among components. The model also incorporates several design-change management procedures for proposing changes, sending changes, tracking changes, and following up on pending changes. To facilitate the developments of this model, an investigation into the traditional design process was conducted by means of a questionnaire survey to document the flow of design information among the participants and to elicit some of the rules-of-thumb used by expert designers to improve coordination. To demonstrate the concepts presented in this research, a prototype of a collaborative system for design coordination was developed. The proposed prototype incorporates a client/server environment and Internet-based collaboration tools for sharing documents, reviewing changes, and conferencing among remote design participants. The prototype was successfully applied to a real-world example project to demonstrate the usefulness of the model and its capabilities over current practice. The opinions of expert designers on the prototype performance were then solicited and used to both refine its components and evaluate the usefulness of the model. The perceived benefits of the developed model are expected to be improved design, higher consistency, increased productivity, and better constructability of projects. This research is expected to help design firms become highly competitive, nationally and internationally, within the open market economics being adopted worldwide.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Hegazy, T and Grierson, D
Uncontrolled Keywords: constructability; coordination; market; change management; collaboration; communication; information technology; productivity; questionnaire survey; designer
Index terms: information technology, building component, collaboration, documents, questionnaire, prototype, change management, design team, design change, survey, performance criteria, design process, internet, constructability, coordination, engineering design, investigation, productivity, engineer, computer application, designer, design firm
Subjects: modelling and simulation, contractual arrangements, professional practice, profession, data collection methods, design methods, computing systems, practitioner, performance measurement, management, architectural elements, software systems, construction integration, design process, professional development
Topics: Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here