Multi project environments of construction clients

Blismas, N G (2001) Multi project environments of construction clients. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.

Abstract

The single project paradigm which dominates the literature of both project and construction management research does not accurately reflect the reality of many construction clients, who have large ongoing construction portfolios rather than one off construction projects. It is contended that the forces behind the multi-project environment (MPE) of construction clients are different to those traditionally viewed within the single project paradigm. Although several concepts of MPEs exist, an investigation of the form and dynamic interactions of components within MPEs of construction clients was lacking. The main objectives of the research were (a) to determine the major factors influencing project delivery within the MPE, (b) to investigate the interaction between these factors and the attributes of different forms of MPEs, (c) to develop a typology of the MPE of construction clients, and (d) suggest policies for effective management of MPEs. The MPEs of six construction clients were explored. The cases included a variety of retailers, a hotel group, a utility company and a housing and commercial developer to gain a range of perspectives within both primary and secondary experienced clients. Propositions were used as guidance for the investigation and analysis of the data, which consisted of interviews and organisational documentation. The data indicated that the business environment strongly drives the project inception process. However, the inherent uncertainty within the general environment causes a milieu of unpredictable change within the project delivery process, which in turn manifests in compromised performance and outcomes. Factors influencing the process are the lack of 'continuity' within workload, contractual relationships, expertise and production, with concomitant effects on project outcomes. Suppliers perceive clients as 'inhibiting continuity' thereby nullifying advantages inherent in repetitive and lean production principles. Other factors influencing the process are high planning authority intervention, low client commitment and low standardisation. Causal networks and an Influences model were used to graphically capture the dynamics of these factors within the MPE. A typology of the MPE of construction clients was developed and validated through literal and theoretical replication between cases. Three main types emerged as descriptive of programmes within client’s construction portfolios; Bounded programmes, Target programmes and Rolling programmes. The distinctive features of each type suggest that specific approaches are necessary for the successful delivery of projects within a portfolio. Solutions suggested by the data are presented.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: commercial; components; construction project; client; developer
Index terms: documentation, construction project, programme, construction client, investigation, project outcome, project delivery, contractual relationship, interview, planning authority, commitment, workload, lean production, dynamics, management research, housing, hotel, standardization, interaction, paradigm
Subjects: management, systems engineering, project delivery, professional development, performance measurement, behavioral psychology, production management, contractual relationship, education and knowledge transfer, psychology, sociology, construction type, project completion, research design and methodology, practitioner, data collection methods, project controls, manufacturing engineering
Topics: Quality Management, Procurement, Human Resources, Project Management, Construction Technology, Organizational Design, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Contract Administration, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here