Handojo, T (2001) The framework of a statistical acceptance plan based on the permanent deformation potential of asphalt concrete. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Abstract
The use of end-result specifications in highway construction is considered to be highly variable, which will create different risk implications for the contractor and the agency. In addition, recent research shows that control of compositional properties is not an adequate tool in controlling the expected performance of asphalt concrete. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate mechanical properties using performance tests, so that the acceptance procedure fairly determines compliance to the performance specifications. The purpose of the study was to develop a framework of statistical acceptance procedures for SHAs, based on the predicted permanent deformation potential, using performance tests. A life cycle costs analysis was conducted based on the expected performance and maintenance costs, in accordance with the FHWA guidance and recommendations. The proposed procedure provides significant contribution towards the existing acceptance procedures, including a uniquely constructed performance-based specification with thorough statistical consideration. The proposed specification modified the acceptance for bulk materials to accommodate the severity of pavement distress (Use of the 80th percentile of distress prediction using beta distribution). Application of the maximum permanent shear strain (mpss) as specific quality measure is presented. Another important benefit is the capability to define the risks between the agency and the contractor within the acceptance limits. Within the acceptance range, the risks of the contractor to be underpaid or the agency to overpay were obtained using simulation of the proposed plan with typical mean of mpss ranging from 1. 0% to 4. 8% and variance ranging from 0. 1% to 0. 4% for 8,000-paving lot, with 5 sublots each. The proposed plan involved a unique approach for performance-based specifications. Significant features include the association of acceptance to the expected performance of material, consideration of loss of function in the pay factor, progressive reward for an increasingly desirable process mean, a progressive reward for decreasing process variability, simplicity of use in design and construction, and the potential for application with new materials. Demonstration of the proposed plan using Superpave test data collected by the North East Superpave Center and the data from the Nevada project showed that the proposed plan worked reasonably well and was reliable.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Christensen Jr., D W |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | highway; pavement; specifications; compliance; life cycle; performance-based specification; life cycle cost; simulation |
| Index terms: | life cycle, distress, variance, variability, maintenance cost, design and construction, highway construction, life cycle cost, mechanical property, paving, specification, compliance, performance-based specification, deformation, agency, performance specification |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, health safety and environment, material properties and characteristics, research methods, tendering, civil engineering, financial management, structural engineering, transportation engineering, statistical analysis, sociology, measurement and scaling, value management, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Health and Safety, Procurement, Contract Administration, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here