Lee, S-H (2001) Discriminant function analysis for categorization of best practices. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Abstract
Many studies reveal the positive impacts of best practice use on overall project performance, resulting in a consensus of opinion in the industry that implementation of certain practices leads to improvement. Yet there have been no definitive studies reporting in a quantitative manner, the impact of best practices on different project objectives. This research seeks to suggest possible ways to improve two different aspects of project performance: cost and schedule, using suitable best practices. In order to achieve this, the study develops project performance classification models using multiple discriminant function analyses that divide project cost and schedule performance into four groups. The study will examine the best practices that discriminate the most among these four groups. These results are then summarized into a best practice uses categorization for project cost and schedule performance. The Construction Industry Institute Benchmarking and Metrics database, containing almost 1000 projects, provided the basis for development of the models and supplied data to perform the analyses. The study will also present a software application based on the results of discriminant function analyses that predicts project cost and schedule performance and suggests greater implementation of critical practices in order to improve project cost and schedule performance. Finally, the study will close by presenting an overall project performance improvement process, using the developed software application. Conclusions and recommendations are provided.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Tucker, R L and Thomas, S R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benchmarking; best practice; performance improvement; project cost; function analysis; project performance |
| Index terms: | discriminant function analysis, database, Construction Industry Institute, function analysis, project performance, best practice, performance improvement, implementation, schedule performance, project cost, benchmarking |
| Subjects: | performance measurement, economics, project management theory and practice, project controls, data management, statistical analysis, research organizations, business, contractual arrangements, data science |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Digital Applications, Time Control, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here