Implementing constructability improvement into the Indonesian construction industry

Trigunarsyah, Bambang (2001) Implementing constructability improvement into the Indonesian construction industry. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.

Abstract

The construction industry is an essential contributor to the process of development, as it influences the others sectors of economy. In most developing countries such as Indonesia, improving construction capacity and capabilities is important, including improving the efficiency, timeliness, and quality of construction works. It is a common practice that many construction projects separate design and construction. The separation of design from production in the construction process has led to a certain amount of isolation of the professionals from technical development in the construction industry, resulting in poor constructability of construction projects that leads to project exceeding budgets and schedule deadlines. This thesis is aimed at identifying what needs to be done to improve constructability of construction project in Indonesia. Three questions need to be answered: first, what is the understanding of Indonesian construction project stakeholders - owners, design engineers and constructors - on constructability and its impact on project performance; second, how is construction integrated into planning and design in existing practice; and third, how can constructability be improved? Two research methods were selected to answer these research questions. The first method assesses current constructability practices using a questionnaire survey distributed to the three main project stakeholders, viz Project Owners, Design Consultants and Construction Contractors, to provide the answer to the first research question and in part to the second research question. The second method uses case studies to provide the basis for answering the second and third research questions. The results suggest that construction project stakeholders in Indonesia have some understanding of the importance of constructability and its impacts on project performance. However, their limited understanding of the concept and the poor availability of qualified personnel prevent them from being more committed to implementation of improvement in constructability. The traditional approach to construction project delivery is the preferred method selected by many project owners. Despite the above limitations, current constructability practices have had some positive impacts on project performance. Design-construction interface and early contractor's involvement were the main factors in improving project performance. To improve the constructability of construction projects in Indonesia several points need to be done. First, the skills and qualifications of construction personnel need to be improved by establishing standard competency requirements. Second, in cases where the design construct or design-manage approaches are not used, it is necessary to optimise the use of the construction management contracting system. Third, it is possible to adapt constructability concepts which have been developed in other countries, but it is necessary to include the following considerations: appropriate construction methods, planning and design for available resources, attention to external factors, quality of local content for material and equipment, and optimise the use of lessons learned.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: constructability; equipment; construction method; developing countries; project delivery; construction contractor; consultant; owner; professional; project stakeholder; Indonesia; project performance; case study; questionnaire survey
Index terms: design and construction, project performance, construction work, project delivery, management contracting, construction industry, implementation, constructability, case study, qualification, Indonesia, efficiency, owner, engineer, project stakeholder, questionnaire, construction process, construction project, lessons learned, construction contractor, developing country, personnel, survey, construction method, construction project delivery, construction personnel
Subjects: management, educational resources, performance management, construction integration, Geography, production management, project management theory and practice, development economics, professional development, project controls, sociology, building construction, industry analysis, workforce, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, operations management, contractual arrangements, project delivery
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Site Management, Time Control, Design Practice, Human Resources, International Construction, Procurement, Geographical Context, Project Management, Education, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here