Wong, C H (2001) A discriminant model for classifying contractor performance on public works projects. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, UK.
Abstract
Contractor selection practices in the UK construction industry have long been criticised and presently a divergent range of methods and preferences exists. Albeit, many of the practices adopted comply with good guidance practices and recommendations from construction reports and commentators. This research focused on UK construction clients' contractor selection preferences i.e. prequalification criteria (PC) and project-specific criteria (PSC). The main aim was to develop a contractor classification framework to assist construction clients' decision-making during tender evaluation. Investigating client selection preferences and behaviours are the main focus of this research. However, attention was also given to the contractors' views upon selection, from prequalification to invitation-to-tender. Factors affecting clients' non-use of standard prequalification practices were found to be a perceived: lack of flexibility and tolerance to clients' specific needs; and a long term confidence with 'in-house' selection practices. With regard to the use of PC and PSC, there appears to be much concordance among clients and contractors, but levels of importance assigned by public clients and clients' representatives were found to be significantly different to some extent in building and civil engineering works. Based on data from 68 small to medium size UK minor works (below £50 million), a contractor classification model (i.e. Z2 model) was developed. Multivariate discriminant analysis is used to classify contractors' past performance into good and poor groups. The classification model is made up of five variables: (i) contractors' plant and equipment resources; (ii) past performance in time on similar projects; (iii) past performance in cost of similar projects; (iv) reputation and image; and (v) relationship with local authority. The developed model has a 90% accuracy in classifying contractors into 'good' and 'poor' groups and a 70% accuracy when tested against independent data.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; contractor; prototype development; questionnaire survey; selection; tendering; UK |
| Index terms: | case study, contractor selection, discriminant analysis, construction client, contractor performance, public work, plant and equipment, construction industry, public client, survey, accuracy, prototype, local authority, questionnaire, tender evaluation, decision-making, preference |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, sociology, industry analysis, statistical analysis, manufacturing engineering, tendering, decision-making and reasoning, contract management, infrastructure engineering, professional development, modelling and simulation, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here