CAD-based integrated simulation environment (CAD-ise)

Xu, J (2001) CAD-based integrated simulation environment (CAD-ise). PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

Existing construction simulation systems lack the capability to integrate with CAD systems. Although many studies and investigations have been carried out, full integration between construction simulation and CAD has not yet been achieved. Most previous work focused on transferring data from CAD systems to simulation systems, which is limited to one-direction information flow. This thesis undertakes an investigation of the integration of computer simulation methods with CAD to facilitate better decision-making during construction and addresses the Product Atomic Component (PAC) that is the fundamental element of integration between CAD and simulation. The thesis objective is to conceptualize an environment that allows an engineer to specify how construction of the facility will be carried out using CAD. The environment could then populate relevant information to produce simulation models that will enable a better understanding of the construction process, better estimating of cost, and appropriate planning. A new product-oriented simulation methodology has been developed to achieve this objective. The prototype system CAD-ISE developed based on this methodology demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of this product-oriented simulation methodology.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: AbouRizk, S
Uncontrolled Keywords: CAD systems; decision making; estimating; integration; simulation
Index terms: investigation, engineer, methodology, decision-making, construction process, integration, estimating, construction simulation, information flow, prototype, computer simulation
Subjects: research methods, building construction, decision analysis, organizational analysis, information systems, data collection methods, profession, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management
Topics: Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here