Yamin, R A (2001) Cumulative effect of productivity rates in linear schedules. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.
Abstract
Due to an increase in competition and project owners requirements, construction companies are becoming more sophisticated. In order to be more efficient and achieve competitive operational advantage, companies are narrowing their focus becoming specialists in certain type of construction projects. This specialization requires scheduling tools that can provide better insights and control on their chosen field and specific type of projects. Highway construction has always been a specialized area of construction in which, linear and continuous type of project are the norm. For these projects synchronization and continuity of work is crucial for efficient use of resources making advantageous to arrange for crews to work continuously. Doing so prevents idle intervals for equipment and manpower (Selinger 1980). For that purpose the project manager (PM) has to be able to identify the time and location when to add, maintain or remove resources in order to meet scheduled completion time. The only scheduling tool capable of reproducing such linear and continuous requirements is the Linear Schedule. Unfortunately, LS have not been developed enough to provide planners with the needed sophisticated analytical and statistical information. The LSMh (Harmelink 1995) is the most advanced LS method, since provides an analytical method to determine the controlling path for LS. However, the LSMh does not consider productivity rate uncertainty and its effects on project completion. The LSMh lacks statistical features that are needed to perform risk management and what-if analysis when using a LS. This research is a natural evolution of the LSMh, incorporating to it three important features. First, it provides three new graphical structures that allow the graphical calculation of the cumulative effects of productivity rate variability (CEPRV) in LS. Second, it proposes the Visual Linear Scheduling Model (VLSM). The VLSM allows planners to determine the existence of multiple controlling activity paths due to productivity uncertainty. Third, a simulation model is proposed that automates the calculation of both the CEPRV and VLSM, and in addition, provide planners with the possibility of calculating the probability of project delay (PPD).
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Harmelink, D J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competition; uncertainty; equipment; highway; manpower; risk management; scheduling; specialization; project manager; probability; productivity; simulation; construction project; owner |
| Index terms: | competition, completion time, linear scheduling, construction project, evolution, project delay, scheduling, specialization, construction company, planner, risk management, highway construction, variability, becoming, project manager, owner, productivity |
| Subjects: | profession, risk assessment, business, organization, environmental science, operations research, production management, management, civil engineering, philosophical process, statistical analysis, market analysis, project controls, sociology |
| Topics: | Time Control, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here