Zhang, N (2001) A computer-based environment for preliminary structural design, design collaboration and design automation of tall buildings. PhD thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.
Abstract
The design of a building involves professionals from several disciplines, starting from the conceptual design to the final design document. The entire process is rather complex in that it requires experts from different disciplines working together to transform their creativity, imagination and innovation as well as their formal knowledge and expertise into a great artifact. After developers and architects have figured out the building type, occupancy, functional requirements, etc. , engineers begin work on the structural design of the building usually in the preliminary design stage. This stage is generally unsupported or less supported by computer aids because preliminary design process requires creative interactions between many professionals and the process of the work has been ill-defined in the past. This dissertation reports on the development of a computer-based environment for the preliminary design of tall building structures. The introduction of computer-aided conceptualisation allows us to think in terms of how to utilize computer tools effectively for the both conceptual and preliminary design stages of tall building design. The main idea presented here is to integrate a range of software systems, each of which can provide one aspect of support to the entire preliminary design process, into a design environment. The objective of this design environment is not to replace human creativity, but to stimulate it and to give guidance in arriving at feasible solutions. Under this environment, the designer's experience, creativity and innovation can be augmented and encouraged; the main tasks and activities performed during the preliminary structural design stage can be automated; moreover data exchange between the architectural design and the structural design can be made collaborative. The main tasks of the traditional tall building preliminary structural design are summarized as follows: (1) Architectural design constraints satisfaction and consistency assurance. (2) Structural form selection; system and layout design. (3) Major member size design and lateral stiffness design. A framework for a computer-based design environment has been designed to provide computer support for the above three main tasks during the preliminary structural design stage. This framework is open so that useful methods, algorithms, modules and tools, etc. can be integrated into the system. Regardless of whether the functional modules or the tools are case-based systems, genetic algorithms, or expert systems, the interface is preserved inside the system. These integrated functional modules provide computer aid from different viewpoints for the above three main tasks in the preliminary structural design stage. Based on the above framework, a computer-based design environment prototype named AutoDesign, which can support structural preliminary design scheme generation, design collaboration and design automation, has been developed. The modules inside this system include a design collaboration tool, a geometric modeling and modification tool, a case-based reasoning system, a member auto-grouping tool, a size automation tool and a structural behavior visualization tool. These tools and the corresponding modules have been integrated into the AutoDesign system to support the three major tasks mentioned above. The methodology, philosophy, idea and algorithm behind these modules and tools are introduced in some detail. Finally two examples are used to demonstrate the entire preliminary structural design process with the AutoDesign system. Results show that the AutoDesign system provides an initial satisfactory solution for the computer-aided preliminary structural design of tall buildings.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Chang, P T Y |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | genetic algorithms; reasoning; occupancy; architectural design; automation; building design; collaboration; creativity; expert system; innovation; structural design; visualization; architects; designer; developer; professional; case-based reasoning |
| Index terms: | building design, data exchange, satisfaction, creativity, engineer, designer, architect, module, dissertation, automation, interaction, modelling, reasoning, tall building, case-based reasoning, design collaboration, genetic algorithm, artifact, computer-based environment, prototype, philosophy, collaboration, methodology, expert system, conceptual design, visualization, preliminary design, architectural design, structural design |
| Subjects: | philosophical studies, innovation and creative processes, digital infrastructure, behavioral psychology, data management, sociology, cognitive psychology, automation and robotics, architectural elements, design practice, management, data exchange, research methods, algorithms, architectural design, analytical methods, project delivery, modelling and simulation, design methods, profession, architectural engineering, construction type, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here