Re-engineering the project procurement process through concurrent engineering

Bowron, J (2002) Re-engineering the project procurement process through concurrent engineering. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.

Abstract

The construction industry in the UK is a multi-billion pound business that contributes, on average 10% of the UK gross domestic product. However, it is seen by many to be underachieving in terms of service delivery and investment opportunities. Projects are frequently late and over budget much to the disappointment of those involved in the industry and especially clients. Many investigations have been commissioned and resulting reports have suggested improvements in the way the industry is organised. Procurement of construction projects in the main are undertaken using methods that support fragmentation and adversarial relationships. However, with the introduction of partnering and prime contracting some improvements have been made. Procurement of a construction project begins with the strategies developed during briefing and is only complete when the facility is handed over to the client, some contract strategies allow for the facility to be completed once it is in operation, has been maintained and eventually is demolished. Costings and programmes are then related to life-cycle issues and aspects such as maintenance have to be taken into account during the facility development stages. The adoption of concurrent engineering (CE) is seen to offer the construction industry a way forward. Having been adopted extensively by manufacturing in its product development stages a similar adoption by the construction industry would go some way to achieving the 30% improvement in real terms suggested by Latham (1994) and Egan (1998). The research described in the thesis aims to develop a new procurement method for the delivery of construction projects. The approach adopted was to identify current methods of procurement and the problems associated with each method. Then using CE as a basis, a new procurement model was developed that offered potential improvements in the construction process between the stages of client briefing and detailed design. The resulting model was evaluated through the application of CE principles into the process and by the presentation and discussion of the method with a number of industry participants, followed by the completion and assessment of a questionnaire. The model was shown to fulfil the principles of CE and could be adopted into construction. It offers a new approach to procurement which in turn would save costs and time and potentially improve the quality of the final construction product.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: briefing; construction project; improvement; investment; partnering; service delivery; client; fragmentation; gross domestic product; UK; United Kingdom
Index terms: investigation, concurrent engineering, construction industry, costing, Latham, service delivery, gross domestic product, procurement method, partnering, questionnaire, contract strategy, construction process, construction project, construction product, project procurement, briefing, product development, programme, fragmentation, United Kingdom, strategy
Subjects: data collection methods, business, innovation studies, scope management, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, management, engineering methods, accounting and finance, production management, Geography, service delivery, partnership management, industry policy reports, project controls, building construction, industry analysis
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Governance, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here