Behavioral analysis of project team performance in China

Fang, Z (2002) Behavioral analysis of project team performance in China. PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Abstract

This research focuses on the operation of project teams in professional institutions (e.g. consulting, engineering and design) from the aspects of organizational behavior and performance. Theorists and practitioners have long applied research results from the theories of management, organization, sociology, and psychology into the study of project procurement performance. Although competing models addressing the relationships among relevant variables, such as performance, motivations, leadership, power etc. have been hypothesized, the amount of vigorous empirical testing of these propositions however is insufficient. In this research, a rational model has been constructed, tentatively attempting to depict the reasonable causalities among project managers' behaviors, team members' motivations, and performance within project teams in present-day China. Here, it is hypothesized that the project managers' behaviors (deriving from leadership and power features) are of independence, and proactively influence upon the motives of team members, which then lead them to attend acts to the attainment of the expected project outputs. A field survey has been conducted to measure quantitatively the variables by means of a questionnaire elaborated theoretically and situationally. By the employment of the sophisticated Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) technique, the a priori hypothesized structural relations have been statistically verified and a modified model which reveals the relational effects among different variables is achieved. As a complement of the quantitative analysis, a qualitative study, by means of field interviewing, has also been carried out to explore deeply the behavioral phenomena within the project teams. Both the quantitative and qualitative studies reveal that the situation of present-day China's project team performance is reasonably portrayed by this model. Consistencies between postulated hypothesis and the empirical outcomes are evident. Testing results show that project managers' leadership (Performance-oriented) and personal charisma exert salient influences on team members' performance. The project managers proactively adopt behavioral flexibility for the optimization of team members' performance. Such flexibility is presumably suggested, and also empirically proven, to be caused mainly by the managers' personal features, such as expertise and charisma. The team members perceive their project managers as having less power possession in some aspects such as benefit (money) allocation. Additionally, it reveals that the professional team members possess strong expert power which reinforces their resistance to comply with the project managers. The implementation of project teams' goals should be ascribed mainly to personal factors of project team members, since the present-day's system of benefit allocation in China's State-owned professional organizations functions ineffectively and inefficiently in terms of its influence to rouse team members' commitment to projects.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: flexibility; optimization; organizational behavior; psychology; sociology; employment; leadership; professional; quantitative analysis; motivation; project team; project manager; China
Index terms: motive, implementation, China, psychology, project team, questionnaire, testing, quantitative analysis, project manager, project procurement, motivation, survey, practitioner, sociology, qualitative study, organizational behaviour, commitment, manager, structural equation modelling, employment
Subjects: Geography, practitioner, statistical analysis, data analysis and analytics, professional practice, research design and methodology, management, contractual arrangements, profession, data collection methods, behavioral psychology, social theory, business, project delivery, psychology
Topics: Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here