Greene, A (2002) Group and individual decision-making in project risk management. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.
Abstract
The nature of the construction project has become increasingly complex and this highlights how project management decision-making has been supplemented with the use of risk management strategies. Subsequently the use of risk management strategies in construction project execution has had some of its weaknesses exposed, namely the failure of such strategies to consider the role of the individual within the risk management process. Consequently this research has undertaken an investigation to ascertain and understand the nature and impact of individual decision-makers upon the decision-making process. The attributes of and influences upon individual decision-making, risk and uncertainty perceptions and preferences have been explored and discussed in some detail. From those the 'risk prism', a metaphor for the perception and preference of risk and uncertainty, was developed to explore the manner in which these decision-making attributes function. An investigation was undertaken to replicate the 'risky shift' phenomenon in decision-making groups populated by construction project management professionals. The results of this investigation ascertained the influence of the group environment upon construction management decision-makers, namely that individuals were influenced to accept greater uncertainty in a group decision environment. Subsequently a case study investigation of an organisations attempt to introduce a new risk management strategy was undertaken from which an enhanced understanding of the group discussion and decision-making environment was ascertained. As a result of these investigations an improved risk management process was developed and is presented within this dissertation.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; decision-making; risk management |
| Index terms: | strategy, preference, decision-making, construction project, management decision, decision-making process, project risk management, case study, dissertation, project management, construction project management, investigation, risk management |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, decision-making and reasoning, management, financial risk, project management theory and practice, production management, risk assessment, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here